MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4380625532 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfad063c_3207

#3207 KIDNEY FUNCTION ESTIMATORS FOR DRUG DOSE ADJUSTMENT OF DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN OLDER ADULTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

2023· article· en· W4380625532 sur OpenAlexaff
Cédric Villain, Natalie Ebert, Tim Bothe, Muhammad Barghouth, Anne‐Katrin Fietz, Antonios Douros, Nina Mielke, Elke Schäeffner

Notice bibliographique

RevueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineApixabanRenal functionAtrial fibrillationRivaroxabanInternal medicineCreatinineHazard ratioPopulationCystatin CMedical prescriptionStroke (engine)WarfarinCardiologyIntensive care medicinePharmacologyConfidence interval

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Aims The Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommend using the Cockcroft-Gault equation (CG) for drug dose adjustment of direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOACs) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), whereas Cardiology guidelines recommend using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). This issue is of great importance in older adults, which are more prone to adverse drug reactions and have higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation as compared to younger adults, and in whom CG has worse diagnostic performance than most eGFR equations. We aimed to assess if prognosis was similar according to drug dose status using different kidney function estimators based on creatinine and/or cystatin C in older adults with NVAF. Method We used data from the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS): a population-based prospective cohort study initiated in 2009, with five biennial study visits. Participants with a history of NVAF (based on ICD-10 codes) and a dispensed prescription of DOAC four months prior to baseline or a follow-up visit according to claims data were included. Drug dose status was defined according to the EMA guidelines. CG, deindexed (in ml/min) creatinine and/or cystatin C-based CKD-EPI, and deindexed BIS 1 (creatinine-based) and BIS 2 (creatinine and cystatin C-based) equations were included. Associations between dosing status and mortality, stroke or systemic embolism, and bleeding events were assessed using marginal structural Cox models with time-varying variables and taking account of various confounders. Subgroup analyses were performed in rivaroxaban and apixaban users, but not in dabigatran and edoxaban users because of too small sample sizes. Results Two hundred twenty four patients treated with DOACs were included in this analysis (median age 87 years, median eGFRCKD-EPIcr 56 ml/min/1.73m², median follow-up length 40 months for the mortality analysis). Of those, 99 (44%) were taking rivaroxaban, 86 (38%) apixaban, 21 (9%) edoxaban, and 18 (8%) dabigatran. Using CG, 154 (69%) had appropriate DOAC dose at baseline, 52 (23%) were underdosed, and 18 (8%) were overdosed. Discrepancies were found by comparing dosing status according to CG and eGFR equations (Figure 1). During the follow-up period, 109 (14.9/100 person-years) participants died, 25 (3.6/100 person-years) experienced a stroke or systemic embolism, and 60 (9.9/100 person-years) experienced a bleeding event. Drug dose status was not significantly associated with mortality and the occurrence of stroke or systemic embolism, whatever equation was used. Underdose status was associated with a significantly lower risk of bleeding events with all the equations but overdose status was not associated with a higher risk of bleeding events (Figure 2). In subgroup analyses, drug dose status was not associated with mortality and bleeding event in apixaban users, whatever equation was used. In rivaroxaban users, underdose status was associated with a significant higher risk of death by using CG, eGFRCKD-EPIcys, and BIS 2, and a lower risk of bleeding event by using eGFRCKD-EPIcr. Conclusion In this population of very old adults with NVAF, drug dose status of DOAC was not associated with mortality or the occurrence of stroke or systemic embolism for any of the studied equations. However, underdose status was associated with bleeding events occurrence regardless of the equation used. These associations differed according to the used drug, but this should be interpreted with cautious due to small sample sizes. Our results do not allow us to provide any guidance which equation to use in this context. A study including a larger group of patients with discrepancy in dose status according to the used equations would be of great interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,025

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,018
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,296
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationMême sujetAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesTravaux en français237 207