#3885 KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION IN EARLY PREGNANCY-ASSOCIATED ATYPICAL HEMOLYTIC UREMIC SYNDROME
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background and Aims Clinical differentiation of pregnancy-associated thrombotic microangiopathies is challenging and can occur in conjunction with or mimic conditions including hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome, pre-eclampsia (PET), thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura (TTP) and atypical HUS (aHUS). aHUS that occurs during pregnancy classically presents in the third trimester. When kidney transplantation is performed in aHUS patients, disease recurrence is high and can be associated with transplant failure. Here, we report a unique case of aHUS that presented early during pregnancy where the patient subsequently underwent kidney transplantation. Method We present a case report. Ethics approval was obtained by the Queen's University Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board. Results A 30 year old G2P0A1 diabetic African American woman presents at 9 weeks gestation with new hypertension. At 18 weeks, she developed acute kidney injury and proteinuria. Further investigations revealed hemoglobin 68 g/L, platelets 120 x 109/L, increased LDH 588 U/L, undetectable haptoglobin and schistocytes on blood smear. Creatinine was 88 umol/L, increased from a baseline of 50 umol/L, and proteinuria greater than 1 g/day. Pre-eclampsia was ruled out as her presentation began at 9 weeks gestation, prior to placental implantation. Placental growth factor levels at 24 and 28 weeks remained >100 pg/mL. HELLP syndrome was excluded given the timing in pregnancy and normal liver enzymes. TTP was excluded with a normal ADAMTS13. Complement Factor H autoantibody was negative. Complement studies revealed grossly elevated soluble C5b-9 level (sC5b-9) of 1.05 (normal <0.3 mg/L). aHUS was diagnosed and she began treatment with eculizumab (ECU). Ex-vivo serum C5b-9 deposition on human microvascular endothelial cells was assessed and was severely abnormal pre-treatment with ECU (activated 223%, normal <150%), and normalized with ECU therapy (activated 123%, normal <150%). Genetic testing eventually revealed a Complement Factor I mutation, NM_000204.3:c.550G/A, p. Vall84Met reported as likely pathogenic and confirming primary aHUS. Due to worsening renal function, she delivered a healthy boy at 30 weeks gestation by Caesarean section. A renal biopsy performed 3 weeks post-partum demonstrated features of TMA, mainly chronic (i.e. treated) and severe diabetic nephropathy with advanced glomerular sclerosis. Six months post-partum, she required dialysis. She remained on ECU and had an unrelated living kidney transplantation 1.5 years later. Her kidney transplantation included basiliximab and methylprednisolone induction. Calcineurin inhibitors were prescribed in standard fashion. Given severity of original multiorgan aHUS and CFI mutation, she was treated with eculizumab 1200 mg the day prior to surgery and another 1200 mg on post operative day 1. Subsequently she was given eculizumab 900 mg weekly for 4 weeks then 1200 mg every 2 weeks. Eculizumab drug level for adequacy of complement blockade was measured on day 4 post transplant and was 279 (therapeutic >100 mcg/mL) and sC5b-9 was 1504 (normal < 244). Repeated ECU level pre 900 mg dose was 189 and sC5b-9 was 392. 6 months post transplant she has excellent graft function without proteinuria (urine ACR 2.2 mg/mmol) or evidence of aHUS recurrence. Conclusion aHUS, although described to occur late in pregnancy or post-partum, presented here during the first trimester. Thus, TMA in pregnancy is not always PET or HELLP. aHUS is a treatable condition in pregnancy, and should be considered as a possibility particularly for presentations occurring prior to 20 weeks gestation. Complement function studies may aid in aHUS diagnosis. Despite extra ECU dosing and therapeutic ECU levels for this patient post kidney transplantation, she had evidence of massive C5 release (grossly elevated sC5b-9 level). sC5b-9 measurement post transplantation may be useful to guide ECU dosing.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».