Conrad Seabaugh & Company: An Inside Look at an Illinois Hinterland Merchant
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
DURING THE 1830s, in the northern Illinois hinterlands, three components were critical to establishing the beginnings of a thriving local economy: a tavern, a mill, and a general store. The success of all three entities depended on the owner's business acumen, a solid customer base, and access to the period's transportation networks. Taverns provided a focal point of communications transfer and lodging for travelers, mills allowed area farmers a means of converting cereal grains into flour in an expeditious manner, and a general store served as the linchpin between local residents and the broader national market. This is the story of the general store of Conrad Seabaugh & Company in Ottawa, LaSalle County, Illinois, utilizing Conrad Seabaugh's massive day-book from 1836 to 1838, a source previously never used by historians.1 All general stores were not alike, nor were their means of accounting and recording. Therefore, Seabaugh's store cannot be said to quite be a representative general store's operation. Despite this, the research provides us with a detailed view into a general store's daily operations. More significantly, this article argues that our perceptions of general stores out in the antebellum hinterlands may need to be adjusted to fit the realities in which some operations engaged. Additionally, Seabaugh's store eventually failed to remain open, but even failed entrepreneurs can elucidate the daily business dealings of a merchant during the era. In fact, it is common consensus that “before the Civil War . . . over ninety-five of every hundred such ventures ended in bankruptcy.”2 As such, this particular merchant's story is more common than one might think, but many failed business records do not exist. Seabaugh offers us an unusual look at a general store as it records the information from its opening until it closes; therefore, we can assess the full run of the store's operation.This research seeks to place this particular store in the existing historiography in several important ways. First, the role of the merchant has been identified as critical to the growth and success of a village. Historian Lewis Atherton noted that “a store . . . was the most important element in Western towns.”3 Town boosters knew that to compete in this era of new western growth, that settlers often sought locations that were served by local stores to acquire the items they could not grow or construct themselves. Likewise, stores offered an option in which to market locals’ agricultural surplus. In 1836, Ottawa was relatively new, and these early merchants played a significant role in how fast and how well a community developed. Seabaugh's complex operations and commitment to a merchant's life demonstrate how such a merchant was essential to community development. Additionally, Gerald Carson asserted that these stores “stood between the artisan and the full-scale factory” as they were also the initial step that local artisans sought to deposit some of their homemade or homespun goods.4 Viewed from this wider lens, this could be where merchants were another link between producers and the broader market, though there is little evidence of this from Seabaugh's store.Next, there are distinct differences between merchants in the hinterlands and those in Chicago. The booming village on the western shore of Lake Michigan funneled raw and finished commodities from both the East and West, making its merchants’ access to commodities unprecedented, as was the access to customers. William Cronon's work on the economic changes brought about by the rise of Chicago focuses primarily on the city, and pre-railroad, hinterland merchants received only a few pages to explain their essential role in the market economy, utilizing the example of John McDowell Burrows of Davenport, Iowa.5 Cronon utilizes Burrows's reminiscences, Fifty Years in Iowa, published in 1888, to provide broad strokes of the merchant's life based on qualitative analysis. By way of comparison, the Seabaugh story is mostly driven by quantitative analysis. Reminiscences can be, and are often, sanitized from the failures and complications encountered by the author, whereas, the accounting sources are produced with the express purpose of telling the reality of the business at hand. More directly in Chicago is Charles Cosgrove's work on Augustus Garrett, an auctioneer in the city, who were the that they not a for from general as played a role in the early of the and merchants were in this of Illinois, to was by from the into the of the many of the village stores to fit the of the in The a few as well some local which allowed the to and to the that with the John work on the in more of the between than residents in the of the the of these more on a of and as they were to The northern of the by from the and were to a more source of and local merchants to This research seeks to provide an to the hinterland merchant to those in these of the a of need to be that of general store and these with or is important to the the in the merchant of merchants general store and on or of commodities as a role the market based on the of the of the which on never their customer was local and quite In these the knew that the success of the offered some they to the business to in more to grow their community on for their The Illinois to the of as it sought to in the that all general stores that in the of and a The the that local This as an to over the and in an to As it the it also allowed to and their in their by more to who also to in the can the growth of the merchant in LaSalle during the In the general a a for which all by local from that during the 1830s, the received a growth of general store By way of comparison, it also the rise of in the the merchant's critical between a and a was that Therefore, that to to a means of local The only for general store in the was in the which most growth, and in the new into The merchant's in to to the of on these as the was by the of the of hinterland general stores and significant growth the as the full of the there may be a with the in though local evidence not of the of local during the that stores were new and were and merchants were of agricultural surplus. there is evidence of the on Seabaugh's its broader cannot be as some the in LaSalle the growth of the merchant This growth was by both the of the and the Illinois and Michigan of these early merchants a or a general with most and merchants in the early of provide In this the for research is a or to the daily as they As customer to out their business for the or the in the day-book and the for the the for customer for the and the business As such, the business for be the Therefore, a common accounting was the were that a for customer in which the store or transfer the day-book to the in a In this manner, store over This was stores in to the many local farmers that as their agricultural As such, many store as or to for their making stores essential to the of many In or are the most and at the customer is the might the day-book in the and the the of the Seabaugh has existing or at all the and the they we can the of and for the has on the as to the but it that the store was in is of evidence it to First, several the those for and all that Conrad Seabaugh was the of the of merchants in the Seabaugh's the day-book Conrad Seabaugh to the LaSalle and for at their on of was 1836, on or the and received at their in and 1838, and there are on In 1838, by for and a on evidence with the to the Illinois and Michigan The example on an on in which it was for of to be out in of our As in was of the to The for this was by in early 1838, Seabaugh and In 1838, the for Seabaugh on and was to and was a there is a out by Seabaugh & Company in the The evidence the day-book to Conrad of store's in Ottawa, little is about Conrad was from County, was there on to Conrad and Conrad was the of and all their as they are in the Seabaugh was a customer of the store that also out for and The and in LaSalle with the run of the noted and who in in failed to their in published in records as early as Seabaugh William and John who and of the business to a John than the that they in the is of the to is from to LaSalle in the to the to a of all LaSalle residents Illinois from and could This was an era of in which one local to a new and or was by more and County, was the of such LaSalle as and to a was for in their new to one and all these were of is also a between the locations between and Ottawa, is in the of the of the into the to the into the Illinois Additionally, a on the of general store was on the of The Seabaugh was of the of a for as by the example of In an to knew from in County, Seabaugh also a of was an for new entrepreneurs to the Illinois of the of the The Western of the was the making it the link with the of the Illinois which growth in the In stores with a of in By way of growth, a the of business operations in from a few to over Ottawa provided a with access to of the of northern the some local entrepreneurs of the economic and sought to grow and their The for as but the of that sought was relatively in of the merchants and in in the early than was not hinterland but was it the booming it in the Ottawa was in the of and the village at the of the and Illinois The to the of the Illinois and local settlers the into a In the was it as the and the of the Additionally, it to be the western of the Illinois and Michigan in 1836, they the at This of transportation access and Ottawa a more important therefore, the most most or be to of in the 1830s, Ottawa several place a role in the success of a Seabaugh at an for growth and customer in northern Illinois could compete with Ottawa with to Additionally, for the of store. In 1836, Seabaugh the in which store rise for from the of Ottawa in in on the of the was at the of the from the and a from both the and Illinois and their that over several a of customers. In the little over were open, a of some of business with This is a significant to the In and to who in therefore, over a of all in the business at Seabaugh's of the Illinois and Michigan was a for the was more than that and entrepreneurs from the or about the western from their local as in East and the of the in local The of the Illinois and Michigan sought to into this and as such, in that they might Seabaugh on of the local in the or the are but most was of the role played in the of and store to the of the in the by merchants Seabaugh on both a general store was for The store to the owner's in of that they could the of and that from their This a means of for store who were of the they could of or more for who local than the and in the also by access to those though a merchant more of the 1838, Seabaugh to in the Western of the In the failed to the of the In a by of the by 1838, the to several in and of Seabaugh received a The a of the from Seabaugh as work was not the was by the but by the store in of a for the that was about to the of Seabaugh & business at not the the or the failed in Seabaugh was in at the of the merchant in LaSalle a to both local and local than they a the they were not the until in the era. The of stores the was to the of in the between the and the in the of merchants to This merchant access to agricultural and they could this to or with an of a little over Atherton in Illinois, that the customer to store was to that LaSalle a of utilizing the it is that Seabaugh's customer was than these are not as store brought in from a of at the or were business customers. we can the to the of or about of the of with in LaSalle County, and the three in the Illinois, and not an to customers. from every in the that a in of the of the the customer were also that from to the several from over the with some from the northern most of that was not to even more often, the business at in with their to the as the Illinois was a between Chicago and the and by the store for the This the one store could in the only of Seabaugh's customer As Seabaugh also a of that the store both during and at Seabaugh's of which we can the of a of of or were the of business this only of as or As a a of business on the agricultural hinterland stores and from the making a link between producers and the broader market. In those producers the they could not or they were new to the items they not More the merchants provided the critical of the this was in its or as its in the where it to of who knew one or As such, merchants in the early of on a of as the of new residents merchants to to some to new depended on or who to for the new or was but it was not or in the new settlers their for some of but it also with the of the produced for on The of by and and which but was not as well as work that might commodities and to This was in that the was relatively to for and its was that it provide for the the of these for or The which on of from or on a success and their there might be several of In some to one merchant might to This depended on initial or the of local merchants the from many farmers in that more to to to their with for not or produced in the merchants brought this to the and their and the local economic This the of to remain in the which the need for in the The that the provided to the as well as the merchant to the these into and it all In the provided a to the for the and that the be in a of to Seabaugh in and of all are with the common the from by utilizing this and as such, we are to a for the of the store. or not at or at a cannot be by accounting store to with the era of therefore, with national in it be quite that some of or new in from another or and we evidence of this in the a in and Seabaugh noted this, with the that with a the and with many Chicago the it is not to this particular is also not that a Seabaugh many their of it for to these into Seabaugh to the or received an that merchants is but the not to in nor it to 1838, Seabaugh for a Seabaugh to with a Seabaugh that the in in which offered more for to the As it was not for in the West, to on may been the Illinois some merchants as in many only in establishing to but they also to farmers to or Seabaugh to to this to that the of than most general stores in the of the As merchants offered to in with the farmers to to the merchant with the and in This as a that was on a of which of economic not with the of for as as one was in the of many settlers to Illinois for or only to many into at the many from in a for of the of the This economic of both and to for and they and sought to the of the of the an that Seabaugh noted day-book was who to the store to to or on an In the day-book and of or were by than the This is of a of both on the of the and the store in could more these as the of and the and their to the were that Seabaugh was of the but for these as the were by that were of or that in and to at that This business are in the In many of these the received for by the in the of store which was or not on 1836, who some work by into Seabaugh's and the that of on an at Seabaugh's for and that said allowed to the of as was on and the In this particular the three of the community to several The of for was as important as the agricultural out in the and also allowed to to their at the store. were only of a items from the store. may be that served as than evidence of in utilizing this noted that of is by its to the not to the This as we cannot that these of full they with the of their to in for only a little over of these nor is it that of the were as to do the The are the of and to the As Seabaugh and the more might be by a Seabaugh or a of in In some the could a that was to run and for a In one who the a in Ottawa, an for the Seabaugh's most customer with an of and a to items to the of more than for As several and their in Ottawa, many may a that might been to as but the records are on this not that could not of their but it was or of all of Seabaugh's that can be to be by or only that in the these only of all and that only one of Seabaugh's business can be directly to such a of the day-book not the of the essential economic of As previously with the few agricultural commodities played a significant role in the life of the The and of these commodities to the in to all and were their in their commodities were used as with at stores for or as to an In to some their for store example was only to as was the in Ottawa, and as the local for business both and with All of were for and the By comparison, of were for the that work that was to This was commodities and could also be for to might be the at Seabaugh's store of all the in the three from a to that most were in or we the also to from from the of the into Seabaugh's store can also be to is a significant of that where in the over but how many of these were in all or in by work is to a of these can be to the work by to both and assess to over of Seabaugh's or were of this fact, cannot be in the day-book to the of received from a not was common in stores to one and In this manner, more for the of an of not that Seabaugh not in one and Charles a from Seabaugh to be by The were until The failed to by the and Seabaugh it to the to The in Seabaugh's for the and was not to local between and Seabaugh was not an The that they the of the the Seabaugh of the is in day-book for and this was the in the day-book were for items that an or a might In fact, one of the most of the day-book is the of items that Seabaugh items into the store a and finished and for a of general items at the of the general items in or is most to and for to and to a of of and and these are only of the general items in that most were and and by of were most finished and even some and and were common but over a also of and and several on and In all items and items in store over is to of to the of the or in for that might be of little was and or to rise by or is used for in over in but it was not to the opening of the store until early the of was with for The to for the of the the store about at on the also for the which that items Seabaugh's also little during the The of items with some and relatively In 1836, at and in it to an of As Seabaugh was in at with only these or market, is day-book only a of for the of of from most important was William to local to LaSalle in as a merchant in failed community of for Chicago in or 1836 and business with to Seabaugh's store in 1836 of was to is but also to in on a and a to Seabaugh's there to in Chicago a and store with in 1836, Seabaugh some business with a in for the and business with it that Seabaugh received some of from these and from local the of the of in Chicago some merchants that could but it that the on that for in were a In the 1830s, it was more common for LaSalle stores to that from the Illinois By that the to Ottawa and could more of the the directly from or from the is to is evidence to store's but evidence to a of the the store was The of of operations is of on of those or business on of the The it is that the store was open, but were at those the store on a that in the store's business to of this may been to business is but this to the of brought is more that the in the area into In 1836, Seabaugh was one of only store and in the The Seabaugh's in at in the area with of that The the by more to an in most the even the of to the of the by the solid and by the The store never quite from the of from 1836 to this to their for and at the for the the the of to the making the a This is with the new of received from and the of the on the The store's for was in and with a of This is with the of with the that for more than at market. were more than to on to at this was unusual about Seabaugh & daily business than only records business on business on those the day-book not to a need to be this is of is as was not on the until the that the the received during the the not more the of evidence the of the cannot be directly to In 1838, and William in as for the that for and to the of on the Illinois The was a that could the to Ottawa even the was the of the was not at the but the of a most customer into the Likewise, the by daily out as more important than the it is that and the of but they were also the of the in The is on be that and business on the of and and these are the this was the era the work as of the was with the and the work more than the of business is not the is a it from to of the a customer can be from all the daily As and the the business to a massive The that the the were a This to a of based the day-book Additionally, in a few Seabaugh of and that to from the with full accounting of a might explain the significant in the Seabaugh for items for and for and the the As a point of the of of or from or not the but the Additionally, Seabaugh also of in that records been or that it was to these of it is that Seabaugh some a day-book by making that in another or by to all in this significant for the business is more at the pages for there are with only one of which are as and as and only one at the The only or their with the of this as a of or were by the store. The and the store. Seabaugh to to commodities and for of the the it that failed to over in is also that failed to to the by records to for these Seabaugh only to for a another and another a that not in the The brought about for of only sought in for in and and than a of business The is that failed to all the more the has been only one was brought Seabaugh by a with John for and for for which they sought the in The that the an for and an but are not The that was but Seabaugh that of the their that the the of and the of the of the of is to the of this as operations at store on of the Seabaugh brought were in LaSalle in the evidence not that Seabaugh was to in or at for these on the it is that at the of in LaSalle County, Conrad Seabaugh could not be a Additionally, the to the of with the Illinois and Michigan in the and existing business all us to the that day-book is not the of business local be to accounting business acumen, the to or the of new cannot be this not be, in used to as a on to a and life in eventually to on way to Seabaugh's in Illinois from 1836 to was that more the of the in the was that daily to in business the of a and community that even the most of was common for and who sought to a out and some to to to their and on to This is a element in the story of western in the during the the store's it was an unusual in the northern Illinois hinterlands based on its customer and of all of which LaSalle a more for new This us the to of all stores with a of items where the can and most of the Seabaugh a store with a of to one could in Chicago or also to the success of local or artisans by the and on Seabaugh's not the of they in the East but in the Seabaugh perceptions of the realities in a of a we can of story to our view of an Illinois hinterland is a of the general items that Seabaugh at store. The the of general items in The an the of that were of said be noted that there were also items that are to or that some may a need for more or with items a The of the is not to be a but to the a broader of the general and used in the from one store's and and items and and and
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».