MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4380877939 · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192148

Transforming teaching: wellbeing and professional practice

2023· article· en· W4380877939 sur OpenAlexaff
Zhengxi Liu

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Psychology · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueEducational and Psychological Assessments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Windsor
Organismes subventionnairesHubei Provincial Department of Education
Mots-clésPsychologyFront (military)Medical educationApplied psychologyPedagogyPsychoanalysisMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In chapter two, drawing on the theory of character strengths (Peterson and Seligman 2004) and the conceptual model for the positive humanities (Tay and Pawelski 2022), the author intends to integrate character strengths into the teaching of literature curriculum as a pathway to foster wellbeing in the classroom. Specifically, a two-step strategy was developed to integrate strengths in literature classes.Step one is to ask students to reflect upon and seek examples of each strength in their lives by means of class discussions and writing tasks to promote their understanding of the core characteristics of the strengths.Step two is to encourage students to link their strengths with their own interpretation of the literary texts, characterization, and plot development. This strength-based reflective teaching model connects students' strengths with the strengths demonstrated by the characters in the literature and thus bridges the gap between wellbeing education and strength-based professional practices.In chapter three, focusing on discovering the best of what is, the author conducted an appreciative inquiry case study of 55 Australian preservice teachers (PST)' perceptions of teaching during COVID-19 and sorted out two overarching themes, namely, PSTs' values and strengths. PSTs' values focused on their judgement belief of what was important for their teaching placement. Flexibility is valued the most across all PSTs' responses as they experienced the constant shifts between in-person and online learning during the pandemic. PSTs' strengths focused on the positive traits that they naturally displayed in the face of challenges and adversity. Resilience is proved to be an integral part of the progression of a PST's professional identity. The findings highlight the importance of the integration of wellbeing into the development of PSTs' professional practices.In the fourth chapter, the author aims to investigate the links between teacher wellbeing and belonging through a case study of an Australian school that has measured its employee wellbeing twice over a period of three years. The results indicate that "teachers' wellbeing is optimal when they have a sense of belonging to their school, are supported by leadership, are resourced to fulfill cognitive needs, and have a collegial climate in which to function" (White and McCallum 2022, p. 68).Moreover, a higher sense of belonging results in not only teachers' stronger professional identity, job satisfaction and commitment, and teaching effectiveness but also students' better academic achievement. Building teacher wellbeing for belonging is particularly critical in the present moment as the profession is being transformed profoundly by global events like the Covid-19 pandemic.Chapter five is centered on exploring teachers' wellbeing and their reflections in three areas during the pandemic, including the impact on teaching and learning, changes to teachers' work, and education transformation, through an online survey.With a methodology of appreciative inquiry that focuses on participants' strengths, this study, first, has found that teachers adapt and respond to the impacts on their teaching quickly, students demonstrate more appreciation for schooling, and efforts of school leaders are increasingly recognized as a strong sense of belonging developed in the whole-school community during the tough time. Then, the study shows that even though the use of technology has made teaching practices more flexible, face-to-face interactions cannot ever be replaced with teacher-student relationships at the core, not the technology. Meanwhile, the study also shows that the pandemic has transformed education so much that it requires every member of the community to work more collectively to respond to the challenges ahead. In brief, teachers are the most critical member in the school community, and their work "should be accepted, rewarded, and valued" (White and McCallum 2022, p. 88), especially as frontline workers during the pandemic.Chapter six explores the possibility of integrating appreciative inquiry (AI) 4-D cyclediscovery, dream, design, and destinyinto the strategic planning summit of a disadvantaged school in South Australia. During the one-day summit, the author, working with the school leadership team, operationalized the first three stages of the cycle and discussed the outcomes. In the discovery stage, four rounds of appreciative questions are developed to guide the participants to recount the stories that are symbolic of the school's strengths, through which the core of the school values are generated. In the dream stage, participants are invited to give examples and stories of what an ideal school looks like with the implementation of the new strategic plan. In the design stage, participants are encouraged to introduce strategic initiatives and measures of success for the school to make their vision a reality. The successful application of AI in the strategic planning of a disadvantaged school provides implications for other educational institutions with limited resources and diverse populations to approach similar challenges.Chapter seven draws on three case studies to examine how quality leadership can facilitate teacher wellbeing and teaching performance. In the first case, the author conducted a comparative study with a sample of 67 early career teachers from both Australia and the UK and found that supportive school leadership impacts teacher wellbeing positively. In the second case, the author conducted an appreciative study involving 770 participants from Australia and found that teachers demonstrate higher levels of wellbeing and sustained career when they feel wellbeing is prioritized at school. In the last case, with 322 respondents from 12 countries, the author discusses how school leaders influence teachers' experience of wellbeing during the pandemic.In a word, school leaders have an important role to play in supporting and nurturing teachers' wellbeing in the workplace.In the last chapter, the author synthesizes the studies presented in the previous chapters and proposes the potential convergence of wellbeing education and teachers' professional practice to achieve the dual goal of education: academic growth and wellbeing. Moreover, several research priorities for the next decade are provided, focusing on integrating evidence-based approaches to wellbeing education in professional development for teachers to promote both teacher wellbeing and student learning growth.Teacher wellbeing matters. This is the most important message that the book under review wants to convey to the readers. It matters because "teachers are the most important in-school factor influencing student achievement, happiness, and satisfaction and are also pivotal members of the school community" (White & McCallum, 2022, p. 33). This view has significant implications for school leadership, initial teacher education, and education research in the coming decades. To begin with, teacher wellbeing and teaching effectiveness can be significantly advanced through quality school leadership. As the world recovers gradually from the pandemic, teachers are experiencing increasing demands and complexity of their work. The extent of support and resources they receive from the school will be a critical determinant that impacts their satisfaction and engagement with the role. Positive and supportive school leadership will lead the school to become a whole professional learning community and promote a better sense of wellbeing for all. Furthermore, initial teacher education is critical to ensure that graduate teachers are classroom ready and stay in the profession. However, up to 50% of new teachers leave or have the intention to leave the profession within the first five years because they are overwhelmed with the challenges of their roles. According to White and McCallum (2020), integrating wellbeing education into initial teacher education programs is an effective response because teacher wellbeing itself is of great importance for "the attraction, retention, and sustainability of the profession" (p. 118). Finally, the 'teacher wellbeing matters' message also provides the directions for future education research, that is, integrating wellbeing education into the whole education systems involving school leadership, wellbeing for teachers, wellbeing for students, and community issues. Only then will we "realize the promise of wellbeing education and its potential to transform teaching" (White and McCallum, 2022, p. ix).As educational transformation is occurring all around the world, it would be more comprehensive if the book could include more participants from different countries other than Australia and the UK, especially from different cultures because wellbeing is conceptualized differently in different cultures (Hine et al., 2022). For example, eastern cultures tend to associate interdependence as important for wellbeing, while western cultures may place a higher value on independence. The inclusion of participants from both western and non-western cultures will make the case studies in the book applicable to many more global contexts.All in all, a concern should not obscure the good. We believe that the value of the book will not only benefit the whole school community involving school leaders, initial teacher educators, teaching practitioners, and the learners specifically but benefit also the whole society at large, which might build a synergy to transform teaching and learning better for the twenty-first century.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,395
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,627

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,434
Écart entre enseignants0,398 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in PsychologyMême sujetEducational and Psychological AssessmentsTravaux en français237 207