324 A 10-year review of infant growth outcomes in a cystic fibrosis centre
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objectives Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an inherited, life-shortening multi-systemic disease.1Patients present predominantly through the UK screening program, but a smaller population initially present as meconium ileus (MI).1 Growth outcomes in infancy, specifically growth achieved at 1 year is an important marker for later lung function and other health markers.2 The primary outcomes were to evaluate the prevalence of re-achieving birth centile by age 1 and the incidence of growth failure (defined by NICE guidelines) of infants managed in a single UK CF Centre. The secondary outcomes were to investigate the growth patterns and outcomes in the two presentation groups (screening vs MI) and in those exclusively breastfed. Methods Data was extracted from a dedicated CF database and medical notes for growth charts and additional clinical information. CF patients born between 2011 and 2021 were selected for inclusion. Anthropometric measurements (centiles, Z-scores) and methods of feeding were recorded three-monthly during the first year of life, and when available at 24 months. Results were then tabulated and statistics were run using SPSS (version 28.0.1.1 15). Results 23 patients were identified. Overall, 73% of patients re-achieved birth centiles at 1 year. There was a prevalence of 39% growth failure. 62.5% of all patients with growth failure re-achieved their birth centiles at 1 year. 15 patients presented through screening, 8 presented with MI. 67% of those with growth failure were MI. Patients presenting with MI were born heavier (Z-score-weight=-0.02±0.66) and longer (Z-score-lenght=2.51±1.31) than patients presenting through screening (Z-score-weight=-0.5±1.05; Z-score-length=1.13±1.43). All patients Z-score-weight declined by 3 months but the decline for MI patients was sharper as seen in figure 1. By 12 months, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean Z-score for weight between the MI (0.40±0.59) and the screening group (0.37±0.80). At birth, 65% of patients were exclusively breast-fed (exBF). At 3 months, that prevalence decreased to 30%, further decreasing to 17% at 12 months. There was a significant difference of -0.31 (95% CI [-0.66; -0.51]) in Z-score-weight between those exBF for 12 months (- 0.51 ± 0.56) compared to all other feeding methods (mixed feeding, exclusive formula etc) (-0.20 ± 0.94); t(27)=-1.76,p=0.045 (Graph 2). Conclusions Despite regular monitoring and intervention, growth failure was still observed in this cohort. CF patients remain high risk for sub-optimal growth, specifically MI patients. Whilst breastfeeding is internationally recommended, this data highlights the extra care required to support growth. References UK Cystic Fibrosis Registry Annual Data Report 2019, Cystic Fibrosis Trust, 2020 August Trajectories of early growth and subsequent lung function in cystic fibrosis: an observational study using UK and Canadian registry data, Macdougall et al., 2022 September
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,010 | 0,016 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».