755 One year review of child death data in greater Glasgow and Clyde
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objectives The mortality rate within Scotland for under 18s is higher than in any other Western European country.1 Just over a quarter of these deaths are preventable.2 The National Hub for Reviewing and Learning from the Deaths of Children and Young people, commissioned by the Scottish Government, was launched on 1st October 2021. This is the first system of its kind in Scotland and aims to ensure a quality review is conducted on the deaths of all live born children up to the date of their 18th birthday, or 26th birthday for care leavers in receipt of continuous care or aftercare at the time of their death. Our objective was to review the data collected in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GGC), the largest health board in Scotland. Method This was a retrospective review of all cases recorded within the GGC Child Death Review research database between 1st October 2021 and 30th September 2022. Those who did not meet criteria for Child Death Review within GGC were excluded, specifically those aged 18–26 years old who were not in ongoing receipt of care at time of death, and children who died within GGC but who resided in a different health board. Results 58 cases met the inclusion criteria of which 37 (64%) were male. 69% of deaths occurred in infants (under 1 year of age). 38% were under 28 days old. Graph 1 illustrates the distribution of child death reviews over the inclusion period. Perinatal/neonatal event accounted for the largest proportion of deaths (38%). of these deaths, 68% were related to prematurity, meaning that prematurity accounted for 26% of all child deaths reviewed. There was only one death amongst 18 – 26 years old which met the inclusion criteria and this was secondary to trauma. Graph 2 shows that the majority of deaths occurred in children from the most deprived areas. Where place of death was known, 82% of deaths occurred within the hospital, 5% in a hospice and 13% occurred outside of a hospital. 98% of families were referred to Child Bereavement UK. Conclusion This abstract describes one year of child death review data since the official launch of the National Hub within GGC. Further data collection over time, and in conjunction with other health boards, will allow us to identify common themes surrounding child death in Scotland and target action to reduce preventable deaths. References NRS. Vital Events Reference Tables: www.nrscotland.gov.uk/statistics-and-datastatistics-by-theme/vital-events NRS. Avoidable Mortality. 2020. Viewed 2nd October 2022. www.nrscotland.gov.uk/statistics-and-data/vital- events/deaths/avoidable-mortality
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,017 | 0,048 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,025 | 0,018 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».