416 Long-term efficacy of dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from an open-label extension trial up to 5 years
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Topical therapies often cannot sufficiently control moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic inflammatory skin disease. Systemic immunosuppressants are not recommended for the long-term treatment of moderate-to-severe AD due to safety concerns. Dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, inhibiting the key drivers of type 2 inflammation. Data from the open-label extension (OLE) study, LIBERTY AD OLE, (NCT01949311) previously demonstrated acceptable safety and sustained efficacy of dupilumab in adult patients for up to 204 weeks (approximately 4 years). This study aims to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD up to 5 years (the end of this OLE study). Adults (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe AD who had participated in any dupilumab parent study (phase 1 through phase 3) were enrolled into the long-term, multicenter OLE with a duration of up to 5 years. Initially, patients enrolled in the OLE were treated with 300-mg dupilumab weekly. In 2019, patients remaining in the study transitioned to dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks in alignment with the approved dupilumab dose regimen. Concomitant treatments for AD were permitted, including topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors. Data are presented as observed for the overall study population (n = 2677). Of the 2677 patients who enrolled, 2207 completed treatment up to Week 52, 362 up to Week 172 and 334 up to Week 260. The most common reason for study withdrawals during the OLE study period was dupilumab approval and commercialization in the patient’s country of enrollment [708 (51.3%)]. Fifty (1.9%) patients withdrew due to lack of efficacy. At the end of the study period, 88.9% of patients achieved a 75% reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score from parent study baseline (PSBL) and 76.2% of patients achieved a 90% reduction in EASI score from PSBL. At Week 260, 66.5% of patients achieved a ≥4-point reduction in the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score from PSBL. A total of 2276 (85.0%) patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events, and 101 (3.8%) patients discontinued treatment permanently due to reported adverse events. Dupilumab had an acceptable safety profile over 5 years of treatment. In this long-term (5 year/260 weeks) open-label study, dupilumab demonstrated robust efficacy substantiated by sustained improvement of AD signs and symptoms (including skin lesions and pruritus) in adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The safety profile was acceptable and consistent with the known safety profile observed in previous dupilumab placebo-controlled studies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».