Examination of Measured to Predicted Hydraulic Properties for Low Impact Development Substrates
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To counter the impacts of climate change and urbanization, engineers have developed ingenious solutions to reduce flooding and capture stormwater contaminants through the use of Low Impact Developments (LIDs). The soil is generally considered to be completely saturated when designing for the LIDs. However, this may not always be an accurate or realistic approach, as the soil could be variably unsaturated leading to inaccurate designs. To analyse the flow under variably unsaturated conditions, Richards’ equation can be used. To solve the Richards’ equation, two nonlinear hydraulic properties, namely soil water characteristic curve (SWCC) and the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity function are required. Laboratory and field measurements of unsaturated hydraulic properties are cumbersome, expensive and time- consuming. Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) estimate soil hydraulic properties using routinely measured soil properties. This paper presents a comparison between the direct measurement obtained through experimental procedures and the use of PTFs to estimate soil hydraulic properties for two green roof and three bioretention soil medias. Comparison between the measured and estimated soil hydraulic properties was accomplished using two different approaches. Statistical analyses and visual comparisons were used to compare the measured and estimated soil hydraulic properties. Additionally, numerical modelling to predict the water balance at the ground surface was conducted using the measured and estimated soil hydraulic properties. In some instances, the use of predicted hydraulic properties resulted in overestimation of the cumulative net infiltration of as much as 60 % for the green roof substrate, but was considered negligible for the bioretention substrate. Design performance criteria for green roof and bioretention facilities were examined using the measured and estimated soil hydraulic properties under extreme precipitation analysis. Results indicate that there is a high level of uncertainty when using PTFs for LID materials. A percent difference between the measured and predicted properties for the green roof peak time delay under a 2-year storm can be as much as 300%. For the bioretention design criteria of a 25-year storm, the surface runoff was overestimated by 14.7 cm and by 100% for the ponding time percent difference.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».