MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4381895453 · doi:10.1353/port.2023.a900054

Fernando Pessoa: A Critical Introduction by Jerónimo Pizarro (review)

2023· article· en· W4381895453 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paulo de Medeiros

Notice bibliographique

RevuePortuguese Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHealth, Education, and Cultural Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArt historyArtPoliticsHumanitiesPolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Fernando Pessoa: A Critical Introduction by Jerónimo Pizarro Paulo de Medeiros Jerónimo Pizarro, Fernando Pessoa: A Critical Introduction (Brighton, Chicago, IL, Toronto: Sussex Academic Press, 2021). xv + 230 pages. Print and ebook. Bartholomew Ryan, Giovanbattista Tusa and Antonio Cardiello (eds), Fernando Pessoa and Philosophy: Countless Lives Inhabit Us (Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2021). xlvi + 387 pages. Print and ebook. Irene Ramalho-Santos, Fernando Pessoa and the Lyric: Disquietude, Rumination, Interruption, Inspiration, Constellation (Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, London: Lexington Books, 2022). x + 179 pages. Print and ebook. Have we entered a kind of Golden Age of Pessoa studies, and if so, will it last? Or are we merely witnessing a flash in the pan, no more than another ephemeral contingency in the annals of criticism? Divining scholarly trends is a bit like reading a crystal ball: though usually harmless, and possibly even entertaining, it is best left alone. Nonetheless, the recent publication, in English, of several notable studies of Fernando Pessoa deserves special notice. I am here referring specifically to Jerónimo Pizarro’s Fernando Pessoa: A Critical Introduction (2021), the multi-authored volume edited by Bartholomew Ryan, Giovanbattista Tusa and Antonio Cardiello on Fernando Pessoa and Philosophy (2021), as well as to Irene Ramalho-Santos’s Fernando Pessoa and the Lyric (2022). But I could equally add to these Richard Zenith’s monumental Pessoa: An Experimental Life (Allen Lane, 2021) and Nick Burns’s article in The New Left Review, ‘The Politics of Fernando Pessoa’ (2021). In a sense the latter two, though quite different in themselves and in comparison to the volumes under discussion, are perhaps even more symptomatic. For one thing, both Zenith’s biography, the first in English, and Burns’s article indicate the desire of a wider public to know more about Pessoa. Zenith’s biography is distinct from a critical study, as it should be, but it is based on a massive amount of research spanning many years; even so, it wears such scholarship lightly as its eminently readable prose has appealed to a large number of people who, one presumes, will thus have [End Page 91] been introduced for the first time, and in some depth, to the work of one of the preeminent modernists. Burns’s piece, in its turn, even though it is mostly based on previous research, conducted primarily by noted historian and Pessoa specialist, José Barreto, performs a similar task, as it might well be a point of entry for those many intellectuals who would not bother looking at a literary journal but who are eager to expand their horizons. Until Jerónimo Pizarro’s Critical Introduction, readers who wanted a concise but ample initiation into the world of Fernando Pessoa, his varied works, his multiple names, and the context in which he lived, had only once choice, namely Darlene J. Sadlier’s An Introduction to Fernando Pessoa: Modernism and the Paradoxes of Authorship. Published in 1998 by Florida University Press and reissued in paperback in 2009, Sadlier’s book has been a staple for a variety of undergraduate courses and remains valuable in spite of its problems, including some lacunae. Pizarro’s book naturally updates Sadlier’s, but it also goes much further. This is due not only to the fact that much more by Pessoa, and on Pessoa, has come to light since 1998, but, more particularly to the very way in which Pizarro has structured his volume, which can be considered as a true mini-course on Fernando Pessoa. It not only guides its readers with a sure hand through the complexities of Pessoa’s own work but also prepares them to navigate the by now labyrinthine field of Pessoa studies. Contrary to what one might have expected from an introductory work, the volume’s thirteen chapters do not follow either chronological or more conventional genre divisions. Instead, the first four chapters focus on specific questions, beginning with ‘Plurality’, which can be seen as an overarching image with which Pizarro would have us read Pessoa. Following it, we have a chapter on ‘Unity’, another on...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,367
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,072
Tête enseignante GPT0,431
Écart entre enseignants0,358 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePortuguese StudiesMême sujetHealth, Education, and Cultural StudiesTravaux en français237 207