MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4382044772 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2022.a900615

Constructing the Disabled Poetess: The Reception and Poetics of Frances Browne

2022· article· en· W4382044772 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Caley Ehnes, Kylee-Anne Hingston

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian review · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIrish and British Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryPoeticsFaithLiteratureArtNarrativeIdentity (music)ScholarshipHistoryArt historyPhilosophyAestheticsTheologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Constructing the Disabled Poetess:The Reception and Poetics of Frances Browne Caley Liane Ehnes (bio) and Kylee-Anne Hingston (bio) Recent scholarship has highlighted the way nineteenth-century critics "obsessed over" the bodies of popular poetesses Letitia Elizabeth Landon (Brown 187) and Felicia Hemans (Laird 500). Even our own attention as modern readers has a somatic bent: as Tricia Lootens notes, the enduring critical tendency for a "histrionic shying-away from sentimental verse [continues to present] itself as a healthy response to texts conceived as [End Page 166] contagious, fleshly bodies of bad faith" (16; emphasis added). In this paper, we reconsider the "contagious, fleshly bodies of bad faith" and so-called bad poetry by considering a poet whose disabled body became an essential marker of her identity as a poetess, whether she wished it or not. A case study of Frances Browne's early poetry and the editorial notes and reviews that reframed her as "the Blind Poetess of Ulster" demonstrates the ease with which the disabled body was integrated into the cultural narrative of the Victorian poetess. Building on Alexis Easley's reading of Browne's position in and engagement with the new media of the era, this essay rereads Browne's early poetry as part of the rise of the poetess and invites a reconsideration of her poetry and her reception as a disabled poetess. In particular, we find in Browne's early poetry a distinct consciousness of and even push-back against the dominant cultural significations of non-normative bodies. Throughout her career, Browne deftly navigated the literary market, embodying the roles demanded of her by her publishers, editors, and the public; however, unlike her early self-branding as an Irish poetess (Easley 177), her identity as a blind working-class poet was imposed upon her by the Countess of Blessington through a note she appended to Browne's first contribution to The Keepsake in 1843. Blessington's note invites readers to interpret Browne's poem through both an aesthetic and biographical lens, merging Browne's poetic aesthetics with both her lived experience as a disabled woman and her "humble" origins, transforming her into a disabled working-class poetess whose "genius … surely acquires double the value" due to the circumstances surrounding it (111). This positioning of Browne as a "genius" whose work as a poetess is more remarkable and embodied because of, and not despite, her blindness informs subsequent affective and critical responses to her verse and her genius. For instance, Alicia Jane Sparrow's poetic response to Browne's first poetry volume emphasizes Browne's blindness both as central to her genius and as a source of wonder and inspiration.1 The final stanza of Sparrow's poem asks her imagined version of Browne if the feeling of the sun's rays, the hint of a rose's fragrance, and the sound of a wood-dove singing to her mate are what "give[s] thee gleams of bright-winged things, with loving human eyes?" "Oh!" Sparrow continues, "Chained in dark captivity upon a sunless shore, / Sweet child of genius, tell me, where hast thou learn'd thy lore?" (117).2 Like Letitia Elizabeth Landon's poem for Hemans and Elizabeth Barrett Browning's for Landon (discussed by Beverly Taylor elsewhere in this forum), Sparrow's poem in its use of apostrophe to address the absent and silent Browne allows Sparrow, herself a poetess, to define Browne for her readers and create a narrative that serves her own branding. In this case, Sparrow clearly positions Browne's work as limited by blindness in contrast to the critical and informed poetics of the sighted poetess who can see with "human eyes" and learn poetic "lore" from knowable sources. Reading Browne as part of this tradition encourages a re-evaluation of her poetry [End Page 167] by highlighting the artificial and arbitrary nature of the poetess designation and the way such categories shape reception and interpretation of female poets from this era. One of Browne's earliest periodical poems, the Irish Penny Journal's "The Pilgrim at the Well," further demonstrates how Browne's later reputation as a blind poetess colours the way critics read her poetry...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,794
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,890

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,295
Écart entre enseignants0,276 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian reviewMême sujetIrish and British StudiesTravaux en français237 207