Efficacy of inclusion of vitamin U and provitamin B5 combination in the complex therapy of primary osteoarthritis against the background of gastrogenic exocrine pancreatic insufficiency
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Clinical comorbidities at osteoarthritis (OA) complicate its treatment. The number and nature of various comorbid conditions determine the severity of the condition in patients with multimorbidity. However, apart from the common risk factors such as aging and obesity, little is known about the biological plausibility of explaining the co‑occurrence of OA and comorbidities. According to the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, EULAR, and the National Institute of Health and Nursing, the diagnosis and treatment of specific comorbidities, as well as understanding their nature in OA, are important for choosing the best treatment tactics.
 Objective — to investigate efficacy of inclusion of vitamin U and provitamin B5 combination in the complex therapy of patients with primary OA in comorbidity with gastrogenic exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) for the correction of clinical syndromes.
 Materials and methods. Examinations involved 61 patients with primary OA in comorbidity with gastrointestinal diseases, accompanied by EPI of gastrogenic genesis without exacerbation. The comparison group consisted of 30 practically healthy people. All patients were divided into two comparable groups: group 1 (n=30) received a course of basic therapy drugs, namely: nonsteroidal anti‑inflammatory drugs, chondroprotectors and/or chondrostimulators, antispasmodics, prokinetics, proton pump inhibitors, enzyme agents (pancreatin); group 2 (n=31), in addition to the course of basic therapy, received a course of the vitamin drug combination of vitamin U and provitamin B5, 2 tablets once a day for 6 weeks. The calculation of the WOMAC index (Western Ontario and McMaster University) was used to assess the articular status of patients with primary OA, as well as the effectiveness of the treatment measures. Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire was used to assess gastrointestinal symptoms.
 Results. The proposed complex treatment of patients with primary OA with gastrogenic EPI with the additional inclusion of a vitamin preparation combination of vitamin U and provitamin B5 contributed to more significant regression of WOMAC indices compared to that during protocol treatment (the total WOMAC index decreased by 16.03% against 9.10%, respectively) and indicators of the scales of the GSRS questionnaire in comparison with the subgroup that received treatment according to the protocol (in total — by 35.96% vs. 22.19%, p <0.05),
 Conclusions. The study results showed the advisability of using a vitamin medication, a combination of vitamin U and provitamin B5. in the treatment of patients with primary OA with gastrogenic EPI.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».