Research Hotspots and Trend Analysis of User Experience Design for Healthcare Service System
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
International Organization for Standardization(ISO) defines user experience as the perceptions and responses of users about the usage or anticipated use of a system, product, or service. The notion of "patient-centred" service has steadily evolved over the last several years, focusing on user experience in the healthcare service system. Current research on user experience in healthcare service systems integrates topics such as psychology, design, and engineering. It is impossible to conduct an impartial analysis of this multidisciplinary topic based on a survey of the traditional literature due to the complexity and volume of the reference material. This study utilises bibliometrics to visualise the retrieved data's knowledge structure and structure of the retrieved data and to offer a foundation for future research in the area of user experience design for healthcare service systems.The information for this research comes from the Web of Science. The search strategy was TS=((User Experience)AND(Medical Services OR Medical Products OR Medical Diagnostic Equipment)), and the search sources were the five primary citation indexes typically utilised in the WOS database: SSCI, SCI-Expanded, A&HCI, CPCI-S and CPCI-SSH. During the search process, the sources had to be modified or eliminated to prevent the loss of interdisciplinary literature. The search results were produced as "complete records and cited references" text files. Manual screening is used to screen out publications that diverge from the subject of the study, lack on-site information (e.g., time, keywords, authors, and other crucial information), include duplicate data, or are otherwise distracting. For additional quantitative analysis, a total of 2030 articles were retrieved.This work employs a mix of bibliometrics, content analysis, and information visualisation, as proposed by Pritchard in 1969: bibliometrics may assist in identifying patterns and information in vast volumes of literature via quantitative analysis of all sorts of literature. The study also used a combination of two bibliometric tools, CiteSpace and VOSviewer, to examine keyword co-occurrence analysis and literature co-citation in the cited literature and to map the associated scientific information to visualise research paths and frontier regions.The results of the study indicate that: 1. From a macro perspective, the number of documents in the search area is increasing and will remain a key research direction in the academic community; 2. From the perspective of the number of articles published, the UK, the US, China, and Canada are leading the research in this field; kings coll London, Mcmaster univ, Boston univ and other institutions are more active, but there are few high-producing institutions, and eastern Europe is the least productive region. The need for more collaboration between research institutions and between institutions and writers and the shortage of prolific authors represent the most significant research limitations. 3.The disciplines of "healthcare," "experience," "mental health," "services," "telemedicine," "patient satisfaction," "impact," and "schizophrenia" are varied and strongly interrelated. Nonetheless, this topic's fundamental study has generated many great works.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle