Approach to aortic root enlargement in a patient with a previous Bentall procedure: A case report and technical description
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Central MessageA patient with 3 previous cardiac surgeries and recent Bentall procedure required reoperation with hemi-Commando root enlargement showing feasibility of this procedure even in redo aortic root surgery.See Commentary on page XXX. A patient with 3 previous cardiac surgeries and recent Bentall procedure required reoperation with hemi-Commando root enlargement showing feasibility of this procedure even in redo aortic root surgery. See Commentary on page XXX. One challenging scenario in surgical aortic valve (AV) replacement is the small aortic root. A small aortic root limits the size of prosthetic valve that may be implanted and increases the risk of patient–prosthesis mismatch.1Coutinho G.F. Correia P.M. Paupério G. de Oliveira F. Antunes M.J. Aortic root enlargement does not increase the surgical risk and short-term patient outcome?.Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2011; 40: 441-447PubMed Google Scholar,2Yu W. Tam D.Y. Rocha R.V. Makhdoum A. Ouzounian M. Fremes S.E. Aortic root enlargement is safe and reduces the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch: a meta-analysis of early and late outcomes.Can J Cardiol. 2019; 35: 782-790Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar Several valve options exist with larger effective orifice area or improved flow characteristics compared with a standard, stented, bioprosthetic valve, including supraannular, stentless, or mechanical valves.1Coutinho G.F. Correia P.M. Paupério G. de Oliveira F. Antunes M.J. Aortic root enlargement does not increase the surgical risk and short-term patient outcome?.Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2011; 40: 441-447PubMed Google Scholar,3Sankalp S. Yadav M. Kunwar S.S. Gupta A. Analysis of various techniques of aortic root enlargement.Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2021; 29: 565-573Crossref Scopus (7) Google Scholar When these options are not suitable, an aortic root enlargement (ARE) allows for the implantation of a larger valve. Whereas ARE techniques are widely utilized, an extensive ARE in the context of a previous Bentall procedure has not been described to the authors’ knowledge. Herein, we describe the case of a patient with a complex past surgical history presenting with recurrent aortic aneurysm requiring repeat surgical intervention and ARE. The patient provided written informed consent to publish their case; institutional review board approval was not required. A 49-year-old man with a complex past cardiac surgical history, including AV repair at age 10 years, homograft aortic root replacement at age 16 years, and modified bio-Bentall procedure at age 41 years. Preoperative echocardiogram demonstrated moderate-severe aortic regurgitation (Figure 1). There were no other significant abnormalities. Preoperative angiogram identified no obstructive coronary disease. Left axillary cannulation was performed, given previous right axillary cannulation, and repeat sternotomy was completed. The diaphragmatic surface of the heart, aorta, and superior vena cava were mobilized. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established. An aortotomy was performed. On inspection of the aortic prosthesis, the noncoronary sinus leaflet was partially detached at both posts (Figure 1). The previously placed aortic root was explanted. The aortic annulus would not accommodate a 21-mm valve sizer, so a Nick's ARE was performed. A 21-mm sizer would still not pass. It was clear that an extensive ARE would be required. The previous root enlargement incision was extended onto the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve 7 mm from the free margin and extended through the dome of the left atrium. In a hemi-Commando fashion a piece of prepared bovine pericardium (20 mm maximal width) was placed (Figure 2). Sixteen pledgeted valve sutures were placed through the aortic annulus and pericardial patch, and through a 23-mm On-X valve conduit (On-X Life Technologies, Inc). The valve was secured using the Cor-Knot system (LSI Solutions). The coronary buttons and distal anastomoses were performed. The patient was decannulated, hemostasis was achieved, and the chest was closed in standard fashion. The patient developed third-degree heart block requiring permanent pacemaker on postoperative day 9 and was discharged on postoperative day 11 without further complication. The long-term surgical management of young patients with AV disease is of significant importance. Consideration of the long-term outcomes and required reoperations are crucial.4Deng J. Zhong Q. Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery.Int J Med Sci Clin Invent. 2021; 8: 5421-5427Crossref Google Scholar As highlighted by this case, AV surgery at a young age carries significant risk of reoperation. The patient described required 4 AV surgeries to date, the most recent of which was complicated by restrictive aortic annular size. Although AREs are commonly performed and have been demonstrated to be safe,1Coutinho G.F. Correia P.M. Paupério G. de Oliveira F. Antunes M.J. Aortic root enlargement does not increase the surgical risk and short-term patient outcome?.Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2011; 40: 441-447PubMed Google Scholar,2Yu W. Tam D.Y. Rocha R.V. Makhdoum A. Ouzounian M. Fremes S.E. Aortic root enlargement is safe and reduces the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch: a meta-analysis of early and late outcomes.Can J Cardiol. 2019; 35: 782-790Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar the inability to accommodate an appropriately sized valve in a patient with a previous Bentall surgery is rarely encountered. In this case, a standard Nick's ARE did not provide sufficient expansion of the aortic root and so the incision was extended in a hemi-Commando ARE fashion to achieve adequate enlargement of the aortic root. Various root enlargement techniques have been described with varying degrees of enlargement of the aortic root. These include a Nick's ARE with an incision made in the noncoronary sinus, Nunez root enlargement, which is performed through the left noncommissure, Manougian ARE which is similar to a Nunez ARE but is extended onto the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve and allows for further upsizing, the Konno-Rastan ARE is performed from the right coronary sinus ending in the interventricular septum, and finally the Commando procedure is performed through an incision through the noncoronary sinus into the aortic root, through the anterior leaflet mitral valve, and onto the dome of the left atrium with patch reconstruction of the aorto-mitral curtain.3Sankalp S. Yadav M. Kunwar S.S. Gupta A. Analysis of various techniques of aortic root enlargement.Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2021; 29: 565-573Crossref Scopus (7) Google Scholar,5Massias S.A. Pittams A. Mohamed M. Ahmed S. Younas H. Harky A. Aortic root enlargement: when and how.J Card Surg. 2021; 36: 229-235Crossref Scopus (14) Google Scholar The various ARE techniques allow for the selection of the optimal root enlargement based on the patient's anatomy and required valve size.3Sankalp S. Yadav M. Kunwar S.S. Gupta A. Analysis of various techniques of aortic root enlargement.Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2021; 29: 565-573Crossref Scopus (7) Google Scholar,5Massias S.A. Pittams A. Mohamed M. Ahmed S. Younas H. Harky A. Aortic root enlargement: when and how.J Card Surg. 2021; 36: 229-235Crossref Scopus (14) Google Scholar This case highlights the importance of preoperative planning, both at the time of initial operation of the AV and for any subsequent interventions. A hemi-Commando ARE is feasible in a patient with a previous Bentall procedure and small aortic root requiring aortic valve replacement, and should be considered even in patients with prior aortic root surgery if prosthetic valve sizing is not adequate to prevent patient–prosthesis mismatch.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle