Effects of Melatonin on Glycemic Variability in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Protocol for a Crossover, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Glycemic variability is recognized as a significant factor contributing to the development of micro- and macrovascular complications in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Numerous studies have shown that melatonin, a hormone involved in regulating various biological rhythms, including those related to glucose regulation, such as hunger, satiety, sleep, and circadian hormone secretion (ie, cortisol, growth hormone, catecholamines, and insulin), is deficient in individuals with T2DM. This raises an important question: Could melatonin replacement potentially reduce glycemic variability in these patients? This warrants investigation as a novel approach to improving glycemic control and reducing the risk of complications associated with T2DM. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether melatonin replacement in individuals with T2DM who supposedly have melatonin deficiency can positively impact the regulation of insulin secretion rhythms and improve insulin sensitivity, ultimately resulting in a reduction in glycemic variability. METHODS: This study will use a crossover, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial design. Patients with T2DM in group 1 will receive 3 mg of melatonin at 9:00 PM in the first week, undergo a washout period in the second week, and receive a placebo in the third week (melatonin-washout-placebo). Group 2 will be randomized to receive a placebo-washout-melatonin sequence (3 mg). Capillary blood glucose levels will be measured at 6 different times before and after meals during the last 3 days of the first and third weeks. The study aims to compare the mean differences in blood glucose levels and the coefficient of glycemic variability in patients receiving melatonin and placebo during the first and third weeks. After analyzing the initial results, the number of needed patients will be recalculated. If the recalculated number is higher than 30, new participants will be recruited. Thirty patients with T2DM will be randomized into the 2 groups: melatonin-washout-placebo or placebo-washout-melatonin. RESULTS: Participant recruitment took place between March 2023 to April 2023. In all, 30 participants were eligible and completed the study. We expect that patients will show different glycemic variability on the days they receive placebo or melatonin. Studies on melatonin and glycemic control have shown both positive and negative results. We hope that there will be a positive outcome regarding glycemic variability (ie, a reduction in glycemic variability), as melatonin has a well-described chronobiotic effect in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: This study aims to determine whether melatonin supplementation can effectively reduce glycemic variability in patients with T2DM. The crossover design is necessary due to the multiple variables involved in the circadian variations of glucose, including diet, physical activity, sleep parameters, and pharmacological treatments. The relatively low cost of melatonin and its potential role in reducing the severe complications associated with T2DM have motivated this research effort. Furthermore, the indiscriminate use of melatonin in current times makes conducting this study essential to evaluate the effect of this substance in patients with T2DM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials RBR-6wg54rb; https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-6wg54rb. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/47887.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,011 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,037 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».