MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4383343465 · doi:10.1353/swh.2023.a900766

"It Is Hard to Tell Who Is Who and What is What": An Introduction to the Southwestern Historical Quarterly 's Special Issue on Greater Reconstruction in the Southwestern Borderlands

2023· article· en· W4383343465 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elliott West

Notice bibliographique

RevueSouthwestern historical quarterly · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueAmerican History and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpanish Civil WarNarrativeHistoryLawArt historyClassicsArtLiteraturePolitical scienceArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

"It Is Hard to Tell Who Is Who and What is What":An Introduction to the Southwestern Historical Quarterly's Special Issue on Greater Reconstruction in the Southwestern Borderlands Elliott West (bio) Click for larger view View full resolution An engraving of Gen. Philip H. Sheridan from between 1870 and 1890. Engraved by J. C. Buttre from a photograph by Mathew B. Brady. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2002716946/ [Accessed Apr. 14, 2023]. [End Page i] Recently, American historians have begun to take a fresh look at how we have pictured the middle of the nineteenth century. In particular, they have questioned what Joel Silbey, more than a half-century ago, called the "Civil War synthesis."1 That way of imagining the midcentury begins with the fact of the war, then it views, weighs, and interprets events during those years by whether and how any one of them affected the war, its origins, its prosecution, and its aftermath. So ingrained is that perspective that we call the decades of the 1850s, 1860s, and 1870s the "Civil War Era." The more obviously any development bears on the war, the more prominent the place we give it in the usual narrative. The less anything seems to say about the war, the farther we send it to the edges of the action. No one can credibly question the enormity and extent of the Civil War's consequences for the course of American history and for shifting that course toward what we would come to call "modern America." The question [End Page 1] is whether other events and developments during those years, even if they seem peripheral to the war, had their own weighty consequences and their own value in sharpening our grasp of the last century and three quarters—of how we have moved from then until now. Answering that question is quite a tall order, and as a tentative start, I've suggested elsewhere that we step away from the Civil War synthesis to what I've called the Greater Reconstruction.2 This asks us to pull back in our perspective in both space and time. As of 1848, the United States reached from coast to coast, so in understanding the thirty or so years that followed we ought to give due attention to developments in the newly acquired country, the region we would come to call "the West." That enlarged spatial focus, in turn, has us widening the temporal lens. The fundamental shift in the national trajectory began with its geographical reconstruction, the acquisition between 1845 and 1848 of about three quarters of a billion acres, an area just smaller than modern India. The newly expanded United States immediately began a process of rapid, convulsive changes, one provoked especially by the discovery of California gold in 1848. Those changes shaped profoundly the story of the nation at large, sometimes in ways relating to the Civil War, but at least as often in ways quite apart from it. The Greater Reconstruction would ask us to picture the roughly three decades after the mid-1840s as a drama with two leading actors, the Civil War and expansion, and their aftermath, playing roughly equal roles in the same crucial transition in national life. The two developments followed their own distinct courses and deserve their own telling, but they were also in frequent conversation and interaction. Neither can be understood without the other, and only when we bring them together and give them roughly equal attention will the full national story begin to come truly into focus. The four essays in this issue of the Southwest Historical Quarterly are fine illustrations of the sorts of insights we can gain when we take up that perspective. But let's begin with a caveat. Saying that we ought to give more attention to events in the West glosses over a key point. "The West" is a collective noun. Defined roughly as the space bound by Canada and Mexico, the ninety-eighth meridian, and the Pacific, it is far and away the United States' largest and most diverse region. It was, and it remains, part jigsaw, part mosaic...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,065
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,218

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,003
Communication savante0,0060,004
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0650,012

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSouthwestern historical quarterlyMême sujetAmerican History and CultureTravaux en français237 207