"It Is Hard to Tell Who Is Who and What is What": An Introduction to the Southwestern Historical Quarterly 's Special Issue on Greater Reconstruction in the Southwestern Borderlands
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
"It Is Hard to Tell Who Is Who and What is What":An Introduction to the Southwestern Historical Quarterly's Special Issue on Greater Reconstruction in the Southwestern Borderlands Elliott West (bio) Click for larger view View full resolution An engraving of Gen. Philip H. Sheridan from between 1870 and 1890. Engraved by J. C. Buttre from a photograph by Mathew B. Brady. Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2002716946/ [Accessed Apr. 14, 2023]. [End Page i] Recently, American historians have begun to take a fresh look at how we have pictured the middle of the nineteenth century. In particular, they have questioned what Joel Silbey, more than a half-century ago, called the "Civil War synthesis."1 That way of imagining the midcentury begins with the fact of the war, then it views, weighs, and interprets events during those years by whether and how any one of them affected the war, its origins, its prosecution, and its aftermath. So ingrained is that perspective that we call the decades of the 1850s, 1860s, and 1870s the "Civil War Era." The more obviously any development bears on the war, the more prominent the place we give it in the usual narrative. The less anything seems to say about the war, the farther we send it to the edges of the action. No one can credibly question the enormity and extent of the Civil War's consequences for the course of American history and for shifting that course toward what we would come to call "modern America." The question [End Page 1] is whether other events and developments during those years, even if they seem peripheral to the war, had their own weighty consequences and their own value in sharpening our grasp of the last century and three quarters—of how we have moved from then until now. Answering that question is quite a tall order, and as a tentative start, I've suggested elsewhere that we step away from the Civil War synthesis to what I've called the Greater Reconstruction.2 This asks us to pull back in our perspective in both space and time. As of 1848, the United States reached from coast to coast, so in understanding the thirty or so years that followed we ought to give due attention to developments in the newly acquired country, the region we would come to call "the West." That enlarged spatial focus, in turn, has us widening the temporal lens. The fundamental shift in the national trajectory began with its geographical reconstruction, the acquisition between 1845 and 1848 of about three quarters of a billion acres, an area just smaller than modern India. The newly expanded United States immediately began a process of rapid, convulsive changes, one provoked especially by the discovery of California gold in 1848. Those changes shaped profoundly the story of the nation at large, sometimes in ways relating to the Civil War, but at least as often in ways quite apart from it. The Greater Reconstruction would ask us to picture the roughly three decades after the mid-1840s as a drama with two leading actors, the Civil War and expansion, and their aftermath, playing roughly equal roles in the same crucial transition in national life. The two developments followed their own distinct courses and deserve their own telling, but they were also in frequent conversation and interaction. Neither can be understood without the other, and only when we bring them together and give them roughly equal attention will the full national story begin to come truly into focus. The four essays in this issue of the Southwest Historical Quarterly are fine illustrations of the sorts of insights we can gain when we take up that perspective. But let's begin with a caveat. Saying that we ought to give more attention to events in the West glosses over a key point. "The West" is a collective noun. Defined roughly as the space bound by Canada and Mexico, the ninety-eighth meridian, and the Pacific, it is far and away the United States' largest and most diverse region. It was, and it remains, part jigsaw, part mosaic...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».