Quixotic Memories: Cervantes and Memory in Early Modern Spain by Julia Domínguez (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Quixotic Memories: Cervantes and Memory in Early Modern Spain by Julia Domínguez William Worden Domínguez, Julia. Quixotic Memories: Cervantes and Memory in Early Modern Spain. U of Toronto P, 2022. 261 pp. ISBN: 978-1-4875-4392-1. In the opening pages of this fascinating monograph Julia Domínguez explains that Quixotic Memories “analyzes the essential role of memory within the context of the rapidly shifting cultural production during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and how memory is central to understanding Cervantes’s work” (4). Focusing on Don Quixote, but with occasional reference to other Cervantine works, the book examines in depth both what early modern thinkers wrote about the topic of memory and the fundamental role that memory plays in Cervantes’s writing. Consisting of an introduction, five chapters, and an epilogue, Quixotic Memories expertly combines what was known about memory in the seventeenth century with an insightful analysis of characters and episodes in Don Quixote that involve the topic of memory. The book’s introduction highlights that humanist pedagogy in the age of Cervantes “promoted different instruments, technologies, and artefacts to cope with the ‘information overload’ of the Renaissance, brought about by early modern Spain’s shift from an oral to a written culture stimulated by the advent of the mechanical press” (9). The introduction also establishes the importance of Huarte de San Juan’s Examen de ingenios (1575) for Cervantes and offers an overview of the chapters that follow. The first chapter explains how Plato and Aristotle influenced writers of early modern Spanish medical treatises, and elucidates the important distinction that Aristotle makes between memory—the capacity to store representations of past events, the space where these images were located, and the place where memorization took place—and recollection—“the reconstructive process by which something is recalled through internal operations” (40). It also begins relating these theories about memory to Cervantes’s novel, showing that “[f]or Don Quixote, recollection becomes a reconstructive process similar to an act of reading where his memories are not just ‘read’ but also profoundly visualized” (42). Chapter 2 begins by tracing the development of the art of memory from antiquity (referencing Simonides of Ceos and Cicero) to the Middle Ages (including Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas) to the time of Cervantes. After explaining how these [End Page 162] various thinkers developed systems to improve memory, most often by relating what was to be remembered with an imagined space, Domínguez shows how the episode that recounts Don Quixote’s penance in the Sierra Morena is intimately connected to the art of memory. The third chapter explores the intersection of the art of memory with collective memory in fields as diverse as painting, rhetoric, literature, emblems, and physiognomy. With compelling examples from various episodes in the novel, Domínguez shows that “Don Quixote becomes an iconological repertory where the construction and dissemination of memorable images derive from the precepts of the art of memory” (109). With the printing press producing new texts at an ever-increasing rate, how could one best reckon with the resulting overload of information in the seventeenth century? Chapter 4 addresses the explosion of knowledge in early modern Spain by analyzing the character of the Cousin who accompanies Don Quixote to the Cave of Montesinos, an intriguing humanist who composes tracts in a wide array of subjects. Though the Cousin insists that his books are both useful and entertaining, the topics he studies (e.g., quién fue el primero que tuvo catarro en el mundo) contradict those assertions. This chapter quite astutely reads the Cousin’s episode as a cautionary tale, treating him as someone Cervantes uses to show how not to deal with the proliferation of information that characterized his age. Of the willy-nilly publish-everything approach employed by the humanist, Domínguez maintains, “some scholars like the Cousin have abandoned the rigorous pursuit and publication of original research in favour of printing encyclopedic-type texts that contain fairly useless information” (22). The fifth chapter focuses on the character development of Sancho, a particularly fruitful topic of study given the importance that memory plays in episodes ranging from the squire’s...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».