MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4383378456 · doi:10.5325/weslmethstud.15.2.0218

Doctrinal and Controversial Treatises III (The Works of John Wesley, <i>volume 14</i>)

2023· article· en· W4383378456 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
David M. F. Chapman

Notice bibliographique

RevueWesley and Methodist Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMormonism, Religion, and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDivinityIndex (typography)ClassicsDoctrineHistoryPhilosophyTheologyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This latest volume in the Bicentennial Edition of The Works of John Wesley completes the three-volume subset devoted to his doctrinal and controversial treatises. The four sections cover, respectively, Wesley’s critical engagement with the Moravians, Roman Catholic doctrine and practice, the theology and practice of baptism, and assorted other treatises. Appendix A indicates the textual history of each treatise, including brief details of every edition published during Wesley’s lifetime, together with a guide to variant readings. Appendix B provides convenient access to four manuscript items that help document and illuminate Wesley’s interest in the primitive church during his last five years at Oxford University (1730–35). The volume concludes with indexes to the three-volume subset. Besides the Index of Scriptural References and General Index, a meticulously presented Bibliographical Index opens numerous avenues for detailed study. The bibliography includes published items of authors abridged, quoted, or otherwise mentioned by Wesley in the collection of doctrinal and controversial treatises contained in volumes twelve to fourteen of the Bicentennial Edition of his works, as well as items cited by the editors in their introductory essays, comments, and footnotes.The editors are established scholars in the field of Methodist and Wesley studies. Sarah Heaner Lancaster is Professor of Theology at the Methodist Theological School in Ohio; Randy L. Maddox is Professor Emeritus of Theol­ogy and Wesleyan Studies at Duke Divinity School; Kelly Diehl Yates is Adjunct Professor of Professional Studies at Southern Nazarene University and author of a relevant book on Wesley’s understanding of ‘Catholic Spirit’. The editors each contribute an introductory essay to their respective sections: ‘Treatises Emerging from Debate with the Moravians’ (Lancaster); ‘Treatises on Roman Catholic Belief and Practice’ (Yates and Maddox); ‘Treatises on the Theology and Practice of Baptism’ (Maddox); ‘Other Doctrinal and Controversial Treatises’ (Maddox). Concise introductory comments on each item assist the reader in understanding the material.Several of these treatises are frequently cited in the field of Wesley studies but often in isolation and rarely with sufficiently close attention to detail and historical context or even their setting within the Wesleyan corpus and the development of Wesley’s thought over more than half a century. Others are relatively obscure and seldom feature in studies of Wesley’s prodigious output in the maelstrom of eighteenth-century theological controversy. Since many of the contentious issues that Wesley addressed have proved to be remarkably resilient in subsequent centuries, his engagement with Reformation and Enlightenment thought continue to be of interest in the twenty-first century, if only within the sphere of historical theology and the history of ideas. Even by contemporary intellectual standards, Wesley’s understanding and critique of Roman Catholic belief and practice was either outdated or inadequate. Methodists steeped in Protestantism will be surprised to discover how Wesley never lost his High Church interest in restoring the practices of the primitive church (appendix B). The editors’ selection of material to include in this collection, together with their deft editorial commentary, provides the reader with a reliable means of reading Wesley in controversial and doctrinal mode.In completing the three-volume subset dealing with Wesley’s doctrinal and controversial treatises, volume fourteen provides Wesley and Methodist scholars with an invaluable resource for further research. By locating Wesley’s writings in their historical and intellectual context, the editors have set a standard for future studies on some of the most significant of Wesley’s writings. By grouping treatises in chronological order according to their overarching theme, the editors highlight the complexity and development of Wesley’s thought. Thus warned, the reader is discouraged from various anachronisms such as reading Wesley through the lens of late twentieth-century ecumenism with its theological convergence, which tends to obscure continuing doctrinal divergence.Methodist theologians and others interested in the enduring theological concerns of the eighteenth century will find rich material in this edited collection of Wesley’s doctrinal and controversial treatises. By no means is this scholarly edition exclusively of antiquarian interest, given the relevance of Wesley’s writing to topics of live interest today. Here editor and reader alike are helped by Wesley’s direct theological approach, even if his literary style is often discursive. The editors allow Wesley to speak and be understood across the cultural divide between the centuries, providing copious footnotes to give the reader much useful background or explain obscure references. General readers in Methodist and church history will find in this volume a window into an influential period of theological controversy and strident pamphleteering among the various Christian traditions and intellectual movements in eighteenth-century England.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,752
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,837

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,056
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueWesley and Methodist StudiesMême sujetMormonism, Religion, and HistoryTravaux en français237 207