Notice bibliographique
Résumé
“A birthday is a time to reflect, to take stock, and to look ahead.” – Kevan Manwaring The Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports (IJOCR) is two-year-old already and going on to its third volume with this issue.[1] Case reports have a rich tradition in medicine. The very purpose of IJOCR was to “keep alive the importance of case reports in teaching and learning the art and science of ophthalmology”.[1,2] Our aim was “to provide a unique repository for the pearls of wisdom arising out of astute clinical observations, new insights provided by clinical investigations and imaging, novel treatment methods and surgical procedures, an unusual association of diseases and uncommon complications or astute management of the same, in the form of case reports, photo essays, and ophthalmic images”.[1,2] We intended to democratize academics by providing a window of opportunity for everyone - the residents, fellows-in-training, and non-institutional practitioners to publish.[2] IJOCR has begun very well. In the last two years, we have published a total of 845 case reports, photo essays, and ophthalmic images, in addition to editorials, commentaries, and letters. There were 398 publications in 2021 - 192 case reports, 110 photo essays, and 96 ophthalmic images in the four quarterly issues. In 2022, there was a decent 10% growth – publications scaled up to 447, including 255 case reports, 74 photo essays, and 118 ophthalmic images. The authorship spectrum was diverse, ranging from residents and fellows in training, ophthalmologists in an individual, group, or institutional practice, medical colleges, and academic institutions hailing from 36 countries representing all the continents of the world [Figure 1]. The uptake from India was extremely encouraging with 26 states and union territories being represented [Figure 2].Figure 1: The authors of the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports represent 36 countries and all the continents. The world map shows the countries of origin of the authors (shaded in green): Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Costa Rica, Egypt, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Iran, Israel, Italy, Japan, Liberia, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Nepal, New Zealand, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, and United StatesFigure 2: Authors of the Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports represent 26 states and union territories of India (shaded blue)The number of manuscripts submitted in the category of case reports, photo essays, and ophthalmic images has shown 400% growth in the last 5 years, with about 250% growth in the last two years, corresponding to the initiation of publication of IJOCR. Despite the increased number of submissions and publications, we have optimized the peer review process to 6 weeks and final publication to within three months after acceptance. We have also initiated the process of listing and indexation this year as per the established timelines. IJOCR is a free open-access hybrid journal with an online edition, the PDF and flipbook versions of which are circulated to all the AIOS members, and the hard copy of the journal is supplied to the corresponding authors, subscribers, and libraries. The Journal has a bright online presence with 595555 downloads (an average of 705 per article). Some of the published manuscripts have received robust citations. On behalf of the Editorial Board, I wish to thank the readers, authors, and reviewers for their continued patronage. The response from all the quarters has been very encouraging. It is a matter of time before the Journal matures enough to be considered one of the prominent journals in the category that it represents. “Always note and record the unusual. Publish it. Save it on a permanent record as a short, concise note. Such communications are always of value.” – William Osler
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».