Pain management, pediatric dental injuries, and dental trauma education
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dental TraumatologyVolume 39, Issue 4 p. 291-294 EDITORIAL Pain management, pediatric dental injuries, and dental trauma education Simran Kaur Sarao, Simran Kaur Sarao Assistant EditorSearch for more papers by this authorLiran Levin, Corresponding Author Liran Levin Editor-in-Chief [email protected] Search for more papers by this author Simran Kaur Sarao, Simran Kaur Sarao Assistant EditorSearch for more papers by this authorLiran Levin, Corresponding Author Liran Levin Editor-in-Chief [email protected] Search for more papers by this author First published: 11 July 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12866Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL REFERENCES 1Malamed SF. Pain management following dental trauma and surgical procedures. Dent Traumatol. 2023; 39: 295– 303. 2Denisco RC, Kenna GA, O'Neil MG, Kulich RJ, Moore PA, Kane WT, et al. Prevention of prescription opioid abuse: the role of the dentist. JADA. 2011; 142: 800– 10. 3Shah A, Hayes CJ, Martin BC. Characteristics of initial prescription episodes and likelihood of long-term opioid use—United States, 2006–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017; 66: 265– 9. 4Sakaue T, Togo S, Tsutsui A, Matsuda Y, Nakajima K, Takeda T, et al. Improving light-cured intermediate resin for hard and space mouthguard using a glass fiber. Dent Traumatol. 2022; 39: 27– 131. 5de Bragança GF, de Souza IF, Soares PBF, Soares CJ. Biomechanical effects of a hard insert and air space in mouthguards on the shock absorption and protection against fractures of direct resin composite veneers from trauma. Dent Traumatol. 2023; 39: 314– 23. 6Kiziltan Eliacik B, Eliacik M. Clarifying the effect of refractive errors and stereopsis on traumatic dental injuries in childhood. Dent Traumatol. 2021; 37: 108– 13. 7Verissimo C, Costa PV, Santos-Filho PC, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Soares CJ. Custom-fitted EVA mouthguards: what is the ideal thickness? A dynamic finite element impact study. Dent Traumatol. 2016; 32: 95– 102. 8Tanabe G, Churei H, Wada T, Takahashi H, Uo M, Ueno T. The influence of temperature on sheet lamination process when fabricating mouthguard on dental thermoforming machine. J Oral Sci. 2020; 62: 23– 7. 9Sousa AM, Pinho AC, Messias A, Piedade AP. Present status in polymeric mouthguards. A future area for additive manufacturing? Polymers. 2020; 12:1490. 10Fukasawa S, Churei H, Chowdhury RU, Shirako T, Shahrin S, Shrestha A, et al. Difference among shock-absorbing capabilities of mouthguard materials. Dent Traumatol. 2016; 32: 474– 9. 11Takeda T, Ishigami K, Kawamura S, Nakajima K, Shimada A, Sumii T, et al. Adhesive strength and its improvement referring to the laminated-type mouthguard. Dent Traumatol. 2006; 22: 205– 14. 12Takeda T, Ishigami K, Mishima O, Karasawa K, Kurokawa K, Kajima T, et al. Easy fabrication of a new type of mouthguard incorporating a hard insert and space and offering improved shock absorption ability. Dent Traumatol. 2011; 27: 489– 95. 13de Melo C, Resende JB, Lozada MIT, Mendoza LCL, Ribeiro MTH, Soares PBF, et al. Effect of surface treatment of ethylene vinyl acetate on the delamination of custom-fitted mouthguards. Dent Traumatol. 2023; 39: 324– 32. 14Wing R, James C. Pediatric head injury and concussion. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2013; 31: 653– 75. 15Kanemitsu A, Nakajima K, Tsutsui A, Sakaue T, Togo S, Takeda T, et al. Head injuries caused by contact with teeth during sports and exercise activities in Japanese schools during the period 2012-2018. Dent Traumatol. 2023; 39: 333– 45. 16Stanbouly D, Stewart SJ, Harris JA, Chuang SK. Malar and maxillary fractures among pediatric patients and the risk factors for mortality. Dent Traumatol. 2022; 38: 466– 76. 17Ilyas N, Green A, Karia R, Sood S, Fan K. Demographics and management of paediatric dental-facial trauma in the ‘lockdown’ period: a UK perspective. Dent Traumatol. 2021; 37: 576– 82. 18Costantinides F, Tonizzo M, Dotto F, Lenhardt M, Borella A, Sclabas M, et al. Epidemiological aspects of dental trauma associated with maxillofacial injures: ten years of clinical experience in Trieste, Italy. Dent Traumatol. 2023; 39: 346– 51. 19Kannari L, Marttila E, Thorén H, Toivari M, Snäll J. Mandibular fractures in aged patients—challenges in diagnosis. Dent Traumatol. 2022; 38: 487– 94. 20Chalathadka M, Dengody PK, Ram B, Pasha AK, Madala G, Rao C. Patterns of maxillofacial trauma in helmet vs. non helmet wearing two wheeler drivers in a tertiary care center. Dent Traumatol. 2022; 38: 314– 8. 21Døving M, Naess I, Galteland P, Ramm-Pettersen J, Dalby M, Utheim TP, et al. Anatomical distribution of mandibular fractures from severe bicycling accidents: a 12-year experience from a Norwegian level 1 trauma center. Dent Traumatol. 2022; 38: 424– 30. 22Anyanechi CE. Isolated favorable compound mandibular body fractures: a retrospective review of two cohorts of patients based on the timing of treatment. Dent Traumatol. 2023; 39: 19– 24. 23Antic S, Vukicevic AM, Milasinovic M, Saveljic I, Jovicic G, Filipovic N, et al. Impact of the lower third molar presence and position on the fragility of mandibular angle and condyle: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43: 870– 8. 24Sancar B, Çetiner Y, Dayı E. Evaluation of the pattern of fracture formation from trauma to the human mandible with finite element analysis. Part 1: symphysis region. Dent Traumatol. 2023; 39: 352– 60. 25Wigen TI, Agnalt R, Jacobsen I. Intrusive luxation of permanent incisors in Norwegians aged 6–17 years: a retrospective study of treatment and outcome. Dent Traumatol. 2008; 24: 612– 8. 26Tsilingaridis G, Malmgren B, Andreasen JO, Wigen TI, Maseng Aas AL, Malmgren O. Scandinavian multicenter study on the treatment of 168 patients with 230 intruded permanent teeth-a retrospective cohort study. Dent Traumatol. 2016; 32: 353– 60. 27Wang N, Lei S, Luo R, Chen J, Han J, Zhao Y. Radiographic and histologic evaluation of experimentally induced severe intrusive luxation of immature teeth in rats. J Endod. 2020; 46: 1631– 8. 28Wang N, Gao Y, Ren H, He L, Zhao Y. Histological analysis for pulp mineralisation after severe intrusive luxation of immature molars in rats. Dent Traumatol. 2023; 39: 361– 70. 29Nagendrababu V, Vinothkumar TS, Rossi- Fedele G, Doğramacı EJ, Duncan HF, Abbott PV, et al. Dental patient-reported outcomes following traumatic dental injuries and treatment: a narrative review. Dent Traumatol. 2023; 39: 304– 13. 30Duncan HF, Nagendrababu V, El-Karim I, Dummer PMH. Outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of endodontic treatment for pulpitis and apical periodontitis for use in the development of European society of endodontology S3-level clinical practice guidelines: a consensus-based development. Int Endod J. 2021; 54: 2184– 94. 31 Institute of Medicine (US). Committee on standards for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2011. 32Saikia A, Patil SS, Ms M, Cv D, Sabarish R, Pandian S, et al. Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for traumatic dental injuries. Dent Traumatol. 2023; 39: 371– 80. 33Shiraishi A, Otomo Y, Yoshikawa S, Morishita K, Roberts I, Matsui H. Derivation and validation of an easy-to-compute trauma score that improves prognostication of mortality or the trauma rating index in age, Glasgow coma scale, respiratory rate and systolic blood pressure (TRIAGES) score. Crit Care. 2019; 23: 365. 34Lauridsen E, Hermann NV, Gerds TA, Ahrensburg SS, Kreiborg S, Andreasen JO. Combination injuries 2. The risk of pulp necrosis in permanent teeth with subluxation injuries and concomitant crown fractures. Dent Traumatol. 2012; 28: 371– 8. 35Levin L, Day PF, Hicks L, O'Connell A, Fouad AF, Bourguignon C, et al. International association of dental traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: general introduction. Dent Traumatol. 2020; 36: 309– 13. 36Eden E, Onetto JE, O'Connell AC. Extension of a novel diagnostic index to include soft tissue injuries: modified Eden Baysal dental trauma index. Dent Traumatol. 2021; 37: 749– 57. 37Kaval ME, Ateşçi AA, Kurt SSM, Boyacıoğlu H, Eden E. Assessment of the validity and reliability of a novel dental trauma index. Dent Traumatol. 2023; 39: 381– 5. 38Jadav NM, Abbott PV. Dentist's knowledge of dental trauma based on the International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines: an Australian survey. Dent Traumatol. 2022; 38: 374– 80. 39Tewari N, Sultan F, Mathur VP, Rahul M, Goel S, Bansal K, et al. Global status of knowledge for prevention and emergency management of traumatic dental injuries in dental professionals: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Traumatol. 2021; 37: 161– 76. 40Hartmann RC, Rossetti BR, Siqueira Pinheiro L, Poli de Figueiredo JA, Rossi-Fedele G, Gomes MS, et al. Dentists' knowledge of dental trauma based on the International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines: a survey in South Brazil. Dent Traumatol. 2019; 35: 27– 32. 41Kiani Z, Abbott PV, Levin L. Dental trauma education among Canadian dental schools: a Nationwide survey of dental trauma educators. Dent Traumatol. 2023; 39: 386– 91. 42Kotsanos IN, Tzika E, Economides N, Kotsanos N. Intentional replantation and management of avulsion related ankylosis and external cervical resorption. A 10-year follow up case report. Dent Traumatol. 2023; 39: 392– 8. Volume39, Issue4August 2023Pages 291-294 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».