Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To advance competent nurse learners, nursing programs must maintain currency with health care trends in illness management, technological advances, and other health care innovations. In Canada, more than one-third of individuals live with at least one chronic illness, such as diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, mental illness, or cardiovascular diseases.1 With increased prevalence of chronic illnesses and multimorbidities, health care delivery is moving toward expanded practice in primary care.2 Nurses are uniquely positioned to provide a wide range of services in primary care, including triage; medication management; preventive care; sexual health services; self management interventions, such as smoking and weight loss; and secondary care for coronary heart disease.3 At the same time, primary care has shifted to collaborative health models that rely heavily on shared responsibility of care.4 In many ways, primary care is rich with opportunity for optimized nursing scope of practice and fulfilling clinical experiences. Despite this, many prelicensure nursing programs have limited primary care content and clinical exposure, and nurse learners rank primary care placements as one of their least preferred settings.5–7 There is also significant variability in primary care nursing education requirements, limited longitudinal research pertaining to nursing roles in primary care, and significant variation in the definition of primary care nurses worldwide.8 Nurses, in primary care and elsewhere, are also reporting increased care burden, frequent staff shortages, overfilled units, and failing health structures. Burnout and staffing shortages reduce nursing students’ access to preceptors and newly graduated nurses’ access to mentors, and can negatively impact nursing learners.9 The prospect of redesigning the blueprint for nursing education in a changing health climate is both daunting and exciting. Early introduction to digital health education10; incorporation of simulation-based and virtual education into nursing curriculums11,12; and investment in nurses through continuing professional development opportunities, nursing residency programs, and transition to practice initiatives13 not only provide complementary alternatives to current nursing education, but also foster a sense of agency and pride within the nursing field. While there are many exciting opportunities to expand the breadth of nursing education, the commitment to maintaining education standards that are consistent with research and current health trends is critical. Given the trend toward increasing the number of collaborative health teams in primary care and the limited primary care exposure in many nursing programs, the importance of evaluating current nursing education practices in primary care cannot be overstated. In terms of nursing innovation, a scoping review of primary care in nursing education programs is both timely and relevant.6 Mapping primary care education has the potential to advance current nursing education practices, alter the way that nurse learners perceive primary care, and foster highly competent primary care nurse graduates who can contribute meaningfully to primary care collaborative health teams.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,118 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».