MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4384133803 · doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101345

Investigation and response to Monkeypox virus infection in Kerala, India, July 2022

2023· article· en· W4384133803 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meenakshy Vasu, Lakshmi Geetha Gopalakrishnan, Ajan Maheswaran Jaya, Anuja Ushakumari, Pragya D. Yadav, Prabhdeep Kaur, Srinath Ramamurthy, Mohan Kumar Raju, Anukumar Balakrishnan, Manoj Murhekar

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical Epidemiology and Global Health · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiquePoxvirus research and outbreaks
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesIndian Council of Medical Research
Mots-clésMonkeypoxOutbreakPublic healthMedicineOrthopoxvirusVirologyEnvironmental healthBiologyNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Monkeypox (MPX) cases, endemic in African countries since the 1970s, have been reported in non-endemic countries in 2022.1World Health OrganisationMonkeypox Outbreak 2022 - Global [Internet]. World Health Organisation.https://www.who.int/emergencies/situations/monkeypox-oubreak-2022Google Scholar On Jul 23 2022, World Health Organisation declared the MPX outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.2WHO Director-General declares the ongoing monkeypox outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concernhttps://www.who.int/europe/news/item/23-07-2022-who-director-general-declares-the-ongoing-monkeypox-outbreak-a-public-health-event-of-international-concernGoogle Scholar India initiated surveillance for MPX at international airports. On Jul 12 2022, a traveller from United Arab Emirates (UAE) visited a private hospital in Kollam district, Kerala, for fever, myalgia and rash. He was suspected of MPX and referred to a tertiary care hospital, where he was hospitalised. The samples were sent to ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Pune, for confirmation. The laboratory testing with real-time PCR for Orthopoxvirus MPXV confirmed the diagnosis.3Li Y. Zhao H. Wilkins K. Hughes C. Damon I.K. Real-time PCR assays for the specific detection of monkeypox virus West African and Congo Basin strain DNA.J Virol Methods. 2010 Oct; 169: 223-227Crossref PubMed Scopus (182) Google Scholar Following this, the state and district surveillance units-initiated contact tracing. All identified contacts were followed for 21 days. In addition to the routine surveillance through the Integrated Disease Surveillance program, stimulated passive surveillance was established at government and private hospitals in the state and continued airport surveillance. Protocols were laid out for sample collection, and designated testing labs for real-time PCR for Orthopoxvirus MPXV were identified. From Jul 12 to Feb 18 2023, 130 suspected cases were screened, of which 65% were international travellers. The median age of the suspect cases was 30 years (IQR 15,40), and 89 (68%) were males. Besides the rash, the presenting symptoms among the suspected case patients included fever (60%), headache (11%), lymphadenopathy (4%) and myalgia (10%). 40% of the suspected travellers were from middle eastern countries, 25% (21) from the UK, four from USA, two from New Zealand, and one each from the Netherlands, Egypt, Canada, Maldives and South Africa (see Table 1, Table 2).Table 1Characteristics of case patients with Monkeypox virus infection and course of illness, Kerala, India, July 2022.CaseAgeDate of Onset of SymptomType of facility where probable diagnosis madeDate of collection of positive sampleDuration between onset of symptoms and laboratory diagnosisHospitalisationOutcomeDate of negative test reportDate of discharge/deathA3505/07/22Private13/07/228Symptomatic treatmentDischarged24/07/2230/07/22B3108/07/22Private17/07/229Symptomatic treatmentDischarged03/08/2207/08/22C3513/07/22Government21/07/228Symptomatic treatmentDischarged08/08/2211/08/22D2215/07/22Private30/07/2215Critical care unitDiedNot applicable30/07/22E3023/07/22Government31/07/228Symptomatic treatmentDischarged04/08/2211/08/22 Open table in a new tab Table 2Clinical symptoms among patients with Monkeypox virus infection, Kerala, India, July 2022.Case patientFeverRash in genital areaRash in PalmsRash in faceSites and sequence of rashHeadacheMyalgiaSite of lymphadenopathyWeaknessAYesYesYesYesOro-genitalYesYesCervical, InguinalYesBYesYesYesYesGenital followed by faceYesYesCervicalYesCYesNoYesYesFace followed by neck and handsNoNoCervicalYesDYesNoNoNoNot KnownYesYesInguinalYesEYesYesYesYesGenital followed by faceYesYesNoYes Open table in a new tab 10 (8%) of the 130 suspected cases were positive for MPXV infection. All ten patients were identified in government or private hospitals, where they sought treatment for symptoms. Their median age was 33 (IQR 28,35), and 8 were males. Nine confirmed case-patients travelled to India from different cities in the UAE and were not epidemiologically linked, except one female patient whose spouse was positive for MPX. The documented clinical profile of MPX cases was consistent with the literature except for one death due to encephalitis]. The lack of disease development in any contacts indicated it was not easily transmissible. One of the suspected cases turned positive for buffalo pox. With several travellers coming to India from countries where MPX cases have been reported, cases of MPX in India were expected to increase. Screening of incoming passengers in all international airports has inherent limitations. Such screening is expected to detect patients with lesions on exposed body parts such as the face or palms. And likely to miss lesions on genital/un-exposed regions. The stigma associated with the disease is expected to influence the health-seeking behaviour of suspected patients. Hence, increasing awareness of private and public health providers to suspect MPX in patients presenting with a vesicula-pustular rash with systemic manifestations would be crucial in detecting MPX cases early and preventing further transmission. Early detection and timely response can prevent MPXV infection transmission in India. Study design – MV, LGG, AMJ, AU. Study implementation - MV, LGG, AMJ, AU, PY, SR, AB, Analysis and interpretation of data - MV, LGG, AMJ, AU, PY, PK, SR, MR, AB, MM. Major contribution to writing - MV, LGG, AMJ, AU, PK, SR, MR, MM. Read and approved final version - MV, PY, PK, MR, AB, MM. None.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,014
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,068
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0140,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,120
Tête enseignante GPT0,471
Écart entre enseignants0,350 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueClinical Epidemiology and Global HealthMême sujetPoxvirus research and outbreaksTravaux en français237 207