Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In January 2009, just three weeks after my appointment as professor at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, I attended the first 'halal borrel' , organised by the university's Islamic student association, Mashriq.In Dutch, a 'borrel' is an alcoholic drink, but the word commonly refers to drinks after a work meeting or at a reception.Halal is the theological concept denoting that which is permitted according to Islamic law.The seemingly contradictory messages brought together in 'halal borrel' attracted my attention.It is just a small but meaningful example of the fact that many young Muslims want to make sense of their religion and engage with society.The organisers did not intend to violate Islamic requirements, but they wanted to play with words and attract the attention of potential visitors to the event.However, some critical comments were made by Muslims who considered the combination of these words inappropriate.I recalled this event when I was doing some preparatory work for this book because it was the kind of situation that I have become increasingly interested in over the past two decades.For whatever reasons, Muslims initiate something, or raise a pressing issue, and this may lead to discussions and reactions, both positive and negative.Sometimes 'experts' are asked by the media to explain and interpret 'what is going on' .Many such questions, including some that were addressed to me, deal with what I would now call issues of Islamic authority, such as the meaning of a controversial statement by a theologian, the reasons why young Muslims would leave the country to join Islamic State in Syria, why so many Muslims go to 'halal holiday resorts' , or whether music is allowed in Islam.The implicit assumption behind many of these questions by journalists is that there must be only one 'authorised' answer, the 'rule according to Islam' .When I was working on the book, I sometimes asked family, friends, students, and colleagues what associations and connotations the expression 'Islamic authority' had for them.For many of them, it was related to the position of an Islamic scholar, or what is written in Islamic sources.This is understandable as many introductions to Islam present it as a relatively autonomous and well-defined and unambiguous set of norms, values, and rules.'Islam' refers to the written corpus of knowledge, the doctrine, and the institutional structure.The basic question that is then asked is: 'What does Islam say about …?' The premise is that the doctrine is the source, the blueprint, for the social order from which we must understand and explain it.Such sources are considered to be the essence of the Islamic creed, and the vast majority of Muslims do indeed accept them as authoritative, acknowledge their importance and regard them as a moral compass, so it is not very surprising that many non-Muslims take Thijl Sunier -978-90-04-68492-8
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,015 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».