"SECULARISM WON’T SAVE US FROM SEXISM: ATHEISTS IN ROMANTIC DYADS DEMONSTRATE NON-EGALITARIAN CHORE DIVISION"
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction:Major religions often have scriptures or teachings emphasizing the role of women in performing labour within the home.In contrast, secularism is often argued as promoting egalitarianism in relationships, which should produce less pronounced gender roles.If secularism promotes egalitarianism at an individual level, we would expect atheists in heterosexual, romantic dyads to report greater equality in the performance of unpaid labour.Purpose: Our intent was to explore how atheists divided household labour relative to Roman Catholics, Protestants, Anglicans, Baptists, Christians, Lutherans, Gospel/Pentecostals, Free Church/Presbyterians, United Church, Jews, Hindus, Muslims, Agnostics, and the generically nonreligious.Method: The present study used data from the 2017 Canadian General Social Survey (Nweighted > 14,000,000) to investigate if there was a relationship between atheism and chore division.We retained only individuals who were in a romantic, heterosexual relationship in which they lived with their partner.Our housework variables were: meal preparation, laundry, generic housework, and washing dishes.Respondents could indicate that the chore was performed 'By themself', 'By their partner', or 'Split evenly'.Notably, we controlled for age, marital status, education of respondent, education of partner, employment status of respondent, employment status of partner, and whether children were in the home.Results: We found that the main effects of religious affiliation, religious attendance, prayer, and religiosity had little predictive power.Functionally, religious variables (unadjusted for sex) were not associated with more or less egalitarianism.When sex was added to the model, we found that women were more likely to prepare meals (RRR = 0.21, p < .001),wash laundry (RRR = 0.13, p < .001),perform generic housework (RRR = 0.19, p < .001),and wash the dishes (RRR = 0.47, p < .001).When examining our central research question-whether the relationship between sex and chore performance varied across religious affiliations-we found little evidence to support secularism promoting egalitarianism.Sexism was found to exist within romantic dyads irrespective of religious affiliation, and the burden of chores fell disproportionately on women.Discussion: While sexism is often portrayed as a latent or manifest product of religion, there is little evidence that secular groups (e.g., atheists) demonstrate a greater degree of egalitarianism with respect to the division of unpaid labour in the home.This may suggest that the uneven division of household labour is due to a broader structural sexism as opposed to a narrower religious sexism.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».