Validation of a Smartphone Pupillometry Application in Diagnosing Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The pupillary light reflex (PLR) is an important biomarker for the detection and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI). We investigated the performance of PupilScreen, a smartphone-based pupillometry app, in classifying healthy control subjects and subjects with severe TBI in comparison to the current gold standard NeurOptics pupillometer (NPi-200 model with proprietary Neurological Pupil Index [NPi] TBI severity score). A total of 230 PLR video recordings taken using both the PupilScreen smartphone pupillometer and NeurOptics handheld device (NPi-200) pupillometer were collected from 33 subjects with severe TBI (sTBI) and 132 subjects who were healthy without self-reported neurological disease. Severe TBI status was determined by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at the time of recording. The proprietary NPi score was collected from the NPi-200 pupillometer for each subject. Seven PLR curve morphological parameters were collected from the PupilScreen app for each subject. A comparison via t-test and via binary classification algorithm performance using NPi scores from the NPi-200 and PLR parameter data from the PupilScreen app was completed. This was used to determine how the frequently used NPi-200 proprietary NPi TBI severity score compares to the PupilScreen app in ability to distinguish between healthy and sTBI subjects. Binary classification models for this task were trained for the diagnosis of healthy or severe TBI using logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, and random forest machine learning classification models. Overall classification accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve, and F1 score values were calculated. Median GCS was 15 for the healthy cohort and 6 (interquartile range 2) for the severe TBI cohort. Smartphone app PLR parameters as well as NPi from the digital infrared pupillometer were significantly different between healthy and severe TBI cohorts; 33% of the study cohort had dark eye colors defined as brown eyes of varying shades. Across all classification models, the top performing PLR parameter combination for classifying subjects as healthy or sTBI for PupilScreen was maximum diameter, constriction velocity, maximum constriction velocity, and dilation velocity with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and F1 score of 87%, 85.9%, 88%, 0.869, and 0.85, respectively, in a random forest model. The proprietary NPi TBI severity score demonstrated greatest AUC value, F1 score, and sensitivity of 0.648, 0.567, and 50.9% respectively using a random forest classifier and greatest overall accuracy and specificity of 67.4% and 92.4% using a logistic regression model in the same classification task on the same dataset. The PupilScreen smartphone pupillometry app demonstrated binary healthy versus severe TBI classification ability greater than that of the NPi-200 proprietary NPi TBI severity score. These results may indicate the potential benefit of future study of this PupilScreen smartphone pupillometry application in comparison to the NPi-200 digital infrared pupillometer across the broader TBI spectrum, as well as in other neurological diseases.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».