Daniel Knowles, Yamato: Flagship of the Japanese Imperial Navy by Louis Arthur Norton
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Yamato and its sister ship, Musashi, were the largest battleships ever created and put to sea during wartime.Neither vessel, however, was employed for the purpose for which it had been designed: to engage and destroy the principally intended targets -American battleships.The two were built in secrecy by the Japanese in late 1937 and 1938 respectively, using sophisticated domestic naval construction.American naval experts repeatedly dismissed accurate information about the two ships that proved the Japanese had mastered innovative technologies.There was widespread assumption in the US Navy that Japanese workmanship was inferior to that of the United States.This was the result of racial and cultural prejudice combined with strict Japanese concealment that thwarted American naval intelligence leading up to the Second World War.In many ways, this makes Knowles's book an international, maritime ghost story.The plans for Yamato were drafted in strictest secrecy and few photographs were taken of the completed vessel, either at anchor or underway.Upon sinking, Yamato's remains lay hidden under 1,120 feet (340 metres) of water until 1985, when her broken hull with its Imperial chrysanthemum bow ornament was discovered.After the war, her blueprints and pictorial documents were destroyed by the defeated Japanese government.Yamato was known as battleship number one and the model of the Yamatoclass.Its keel was laid at the Kure Naval Arsenal on 4 November 1937, and her commissioning occurred on 16 December 1941, just after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.The Asian empire had won a decisive naval victory in the Russo-Japanese war in 1904-1905 by applying the tenets put forth in Captain Alfred Thayer Mahan's The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660-1783.Thayer argued that naval dominance was achieved through the employment of a fleet of powerful battleships.The last great battleship clash among these powerful vessels was the 1916 Battle of Jutland near the end of the First World War.The Japanese hierarchy was content to use the old but successful naval engagement playbook.The rise of airpower over heavily armoured battleships was in the development stage shortly after that conflict.United States
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».