“No Matter What I loved Him Through It” A Qualitative Study of Child to Parent Aggression in Adoptive Families
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis explores the resilience of adoptive parents after they have experienced repeated events of Child to Parent Aggression (CPA) with an adoptee.Using social constructionism and the theories of attachment and ecological systems as a basis for my work, I conducted semi-structured interviews with nine participants based in Ontario.I used reflexive thematic analysis to analyze the data from the interviews and generated four themes, How it Starts, Events and Episodes, Impacts, and Resilience to reflect the stories the participants told.They are stories of adoptive parents who remain committed to their relationships with their children, the impacts of CPA, and the struggle to find professionals who can help.The findings of this study point towards a better understanding of the complexity of early childhood events that can lead to CPA, respecting the rights of the children who struggle with CPA, and improved outcomes for adoptive families managing CPA.Using semi-structured interviews, nine participants were interviewed.Using the framework of Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA), the interview transcripts were coded, and themes were generated, reviewed, and defined (Braun & Clarke, 2021).Four themes were identified, How it Starts, Events and Episodes, Impacts, and Resilience.Participants in this study clearly indicated that they sought compassion, understanding, and support from those who worked with their families and for others to understand that the aggression their children exhibited towards them was reactive behaviour based on a history of trauma and loss.This thesis outlines important language considerations, my reflexivity through this process, a review of relevant literature, the theoretical framework guiding this study, the methodology used, the study findings, and a discussion of these findings which add richness and depth to an understanding of adoptive parents' experiences of CPA.The findings of this study support emerging research in the field of CPA, and their implications for adoptive families, policy makers, researchers, and professionals working in the field are discussed.Cottrell (2004) identified and discussed the prevalence of violence, aggression and dominating behaviours of adolescents towards to their parents, referring to it as Child to Parent Abuse.Further, Simmons et al., (2018) identified that the word abuse was a consciously selected term as the authors agreed that neither aggression nor violence demonstrated the breadth of the actions being discussed.They chose to use "child-to-parent abuse to capture the full range of physical, emotional and psychological aggression that may be enacted by a child toward their parent."(p.32) With this Definition of CPA Canadian research by
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,017 | 0,014 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».