;Indian; Under the Law: Acadian Métis Identity in the Post-Daniels Era
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Legally recognized Métis identity in Canada has been predicated upon an Indigenous and Euro-Canadian mixed-heritage community's ability to meet the criteria set out in the Powley test, established as a consequence of the 2003 R. v. Powley decision.The conditions of Powley, employed in a similar manner to R. v. Van der Peet to determine aboriginal rights for Indigenous peoples, address the characterization of a right in question in conjunction with a determination of the existence of the community in a geographic area before effective control by Europeans.In the case of Acadian Métis people, this right generally refers to subsistence harvesting.These strictures on the legal recognition of Métis peoples in Canada have been revisited by the findings of Daniels v. Canada which refer to Métis peoples across Canada, not just in the West, and open the door to formal modes of recognition beyond the scope of section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, in line with the fiduciary responsibility of the federal government to all Métis peoples.My dissertation addresses the lack of acknowledgment of the Sang-Mêlés community of Southwest Nova Scotia as a valid rights-bearing people, equal in legitimacy to any other Métis group in Canada.Through an examination of archival and historical evidence, I illustrate the fact that this is a group reflecting the original métissage of Indigenous inhabitants and European settlers which had its genesis in the Atlantic provinces.Employing an interdisciplinary approach, my unique research contribution incorporates a critical discourse analysis of a variety of documentary sources and oral histories to examine evidence beyond the phenomena of the individual, exposing issues of unequal power relations and structural inequities with a focus on the spatio-temporal effects resulting from the imposition of colonial jurisprudence on our understanding of Métis identity in Eastern Canada.In this work, I contend that, despite the failure of past court challenges, Acadian Métis communities fully satisfy the identarian criterion iii of the Powley test, involving the existence of an historical community that has maintained a degree of continuity up to the present day.Specifically, I suggest that the Powley test itself, designed originally in relation to a community in Ontario, could expand its applicability to address the ramifications of the culturally fracturing experience of the Acadian Deportation, an event which, I argue, makes it particularly challenging for the Acadian Métis to provide the juridical demonstration needed to establish the existence of past and contemporary Indigenous communities.work has had on my doctoral dissertation and I will be forever grateful for his encyclopaedic knowledge, unfailing good humour, and valued friendship.To my supervisor and principal supporter, Dr. Sébastien Malette; I offer my heartfelt appreciation for your dedication both to me and to the unrecognized Métis communities in Eastern Canada.You have lent your heart, body, and soul to this struggle, not to mention your stellar intellect, and I am honoured to work with a man of such dedication, integrity, and strength.I want to express my gratitude, as well, to Trevor Purvis, for bringing a personality into my committee that surpasses the
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,018 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».