Now You See Us: The Politics of Visibility in Mumbai’s “Slum” Activism
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
My research contributes to the fields of politics of visibility and visual culture, as well as material politics or the 'politics of things' and infrastructure.I build on the suggestion that visibility is not to be simply conflated with either social recognition or control and discipline.I examine the various registers of visibility, and how they intersect with the politics of physical objects and infrastructures in the lived experiences of informal settlement activists in Mumbai.I use the language of assemblages to describe the web of human and nonhuman actors involved in activist organizing.My three core arguments emphasize the centrality of a politics of visibility in the activism context in Mumbai.Activists' main role is to direct visibility; this is the common thread connecting activists' activities.Activism is not a calculated attempt to gain resource access.It is a chance to be seen differently.Activist belonging is attached to performative demands which open activist leadership to the criticism that the performance in fact might hinder the stated intentions of the movement; how could new spaces open for accessing scarce resources if notion of the 'good activist' were set aside?This examination centres on ethnographic fieldwork conducted over approximately 18 months in Mumbai, including interviews and conversations with government, nongovernmental, and private sector actors, as well as many activists living inside and outside of informal settlements.I worked with the activist organization Slum Community Action Foundation (SCAF) headed by Vithal Chavan and the much larger, well-established social movement Ghar Bachao Ghar Banao Andolan (GBGBA) under the leadership of Medha Patkar.My perspective comes from embedding myself within activist movements by attending meetings, sharing meals, visiting their homes, co-authoring articles, and traveling with an activist leader and a group of activists to central Maharashtra.This work hopes to open new spaces of inquiry to advance understandings of citizenship and social movements, and to support further scholarship focused on ethnographic methods to explore materiality, visibility, and social movements as an assemblage of human and nonhuman relationships.completing this dissertation.He understood my desire to write something accessible, yet well-informed.His wealth of knowledge spanning multiple bodies of research enabled my cross-disciplinary approach.Thanks also to my committee, Dr. Daiva Stasiulis and Dr. Gopika Solanki, who provided input throughout.My perspective on Visual Culture and the politics of visibility was also greatly enriched through the contributions of Dr. Christiane Wilke, a member of my committee for my first Comprehensive Examination.I am grateful to the Administration and leadership of Carleton's Sociology and Anthropology Department, including especially Dr. Alexis Shotwell for guidance, encouragement, and support in this process.I also appreciate the camaraderie offered by my fellow PhD students in my cohort, particularly during the early stages of the
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,016 | 0,026 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».