MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4384697547 · doi:10.22215/etd/2023-15548

The Remediated Mayhew: Reading and Representing Victorian Print Culture in the Digital Age

2023· dissertation· en· W4384697547 sur OpenAlexaff
Jenna M. Herdman

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Établissements canadiensCarleton University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReading (process)Print culturePerformative utteranceRepresentation (politics)SociologyMedia studiesHistoryVisual artsArtPoliticsAestheticsPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This hybrid dissertation, The Remediated Mayhew, forges a new direction in studies of London Labour and the London Poor (1849-1865), a monumental series of texts compiled by and attributed to the journalist Henry Mayhew (1812-1887).The print and performative mediums through which London Labour was disseminated, its magnitude, polyvocality, and its contradictions mean that it is a difficult text to enter and understand.The dissertation weds print culture and digital media in ways that, like the works that it studies, defy simple classification, linear reading, and traditional literary studies research methodology.I argue for an understanding of London Labour as a series of works subject to remediation throughout its print history and as texts that anticipate digital modes of nonlinear navigation, information management, and participatory reading culture.By reading and representing London Labour through the lens of remediation and digital representation we gain new ways to interpret and experience this text and other works of Victorian print culture.The Remediated Mayhew puts remediation into practice by producing the first scholarly, selected digital edition of London Labour and the London Poor.This digital project, under construction at the Collaborative Organization for Virtual Education (COVE), comprises 138 annotated selections from the London Labour project.The edition foregrounds the serial publication and textual recycling of London Labour's history.Its components include a comprehensive study of the publication history of London Labour, geospatial representation of the edition's contents, and scholarly annotations.Alongside the digital edition are three other chapters: first, a critical commentary on the digital edition in connection with the labour and politics of producing iii digital humanities projects as doctoral work; and second, two scholarly interventions studying the networks of collaborators and readers who shaped the development of London Labour at the mid-nineteenth century.These chapters offer a new analysis of the production, circulation, and reception of London Labour.Drawing on frameworks and practices from Victorian studies, Book History, and the Digital Humanities, The Remediated Mayhew offers critical insight into London Labour and presents a model for future studies and digital representation of complex works of Victorian print culture.Journal of Victorian Culture (2021), examines the collaborative relationships that shaped the development and remediation of London Labour, between Mayhew, his collaborators, and his informants (Chapter 3).The second article, originally published in Book History (2022), examines reader responses to London Labour in connection to contemporary crowd-funding campaigns on social media (Chapter 4).These studies collectively offer new insights into interpreting London Labour in both its historical context and its contemporary significance.By exploring new readings of Mayhew and London Labour, the articles and the digital edition present new ways of remediating and interpreting Victorian print culture texts using the frameworks and practices of digital media.The Remediated Mayhew argues that London Labour anticipates contemporary modes of digital reading and nonlinear hypertext navigation.By harnessing the digital, we are able to study publication history across multiple mediums and unravel the histories of collaboration and authorship that shape London Labour and other works of Victorian print.The digital edition puts into practice these arguments and connections while the articles build a foundation for analyzing the collaborative history of London Labour.The significance of London Labour as an important work of Victorian print culture is reiterated throughout this dissertation.London Labour is a monumental series of texts compiled and attributed to the nineteenth-century journalist and writer Henry Mayhew (1812-1887) as well as to other journalists who contributed to different iterations of the project.Mayhew's survey is the first study of urban poverty explored through the voices of the poor themselves.The text numbers hundreds of distinct articles and inquiries, and it transcends different audiences and cultural meanings.Though the moniker London Labour and the London Poor is typically understood as the four in this chapter and in the Appendices presents the edition's components.Phase 1 will be published in Spring 2023, with 26 primary text selections from London Labour, as a proof of concept of the edition that will undergo peer review.Phase 2, with 138 selections, will add more material to the edition and revise the edition according to feedback from Phase 1.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,108
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,214

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0110,015
Communication savante0,0150,007
Science ouverte0,0010,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetDigital Humanities and ScholarshipTravaux en français237 207