MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4385071801 · doi:10.1093/micmic/ozad067.435

Facile Low-voltage SEM Imaging of Lignocellulosic Biomass using a Low-cost Methanesulfonate Ionic Liquid

2023· article· en· W4385071801 sur OpenAlexaff
Dian Yu, Patrick Woo, Keryn Lian, Jane Y. Howe

Notice bibliographique

RevueMicroscopy and Microanalysis · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineChemistry
ThématiqueElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Établissements canadiensHitachi (Canada)University of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLibrary scienceIonic liquidScience and engineeringArt historyPolitical scienceEngineeringChemistryComputer scienceArtEngineering ethicsOrganic chemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Waste lignocellulosic biomass, often found in agricultural and municipal wastes, is a promising source of carbon due to its low cost and sustainability [1]. For this type of material, developing a high-throughput and surface-sensitive morphological characterization protocol can facilitate the understanding of the effects of their associated environment and processing conditions. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) excels in surface imaging, but since biomass samples are organic and have poor electrical conductivity, they require specialized techniques to avoid to electron beam damage and charging. Sputter coating techniques require additional equipment and training while variable-pressure imaging degrades spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio. Fortunately, room-temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) with low vapor pressure and electrical conductivity have been found to dissipate excess charges and remain stable under high vacuum [2]. However, although a few RTIL solutions have been used to treat wood and other biological samples, the susceptibility of hydrolysis of some anions [3], the high cost due to customized synthesis [4], and the need for chemical purification [5] limit their usefulness for biomass analyses. Moreover, waste biomass can have significantly deformed biological features, lose their water-soluble contents, and undergo significant swelling during the immersion process. Monitoring the morphological changes of the same sample is needed to ensure the reliability of the IL treatment. In this work, an affordable and neutral RTIL, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium methanesulfonate ([EMI][MeSO3]), was selected to treat dried spent black tea and mechanically ground pinecone scales. A Hitachi SU-7000 Schottky Field Emission SEM was used to capture secondary electron (SE) images of the samples at an acceleration voltage of 1 kV and probe current of 7 pA. These parameters were used to partially suppress charging and improve contrast such that low-quality SE images of the samples before IL treatment would serve as usable baselines for morphological comparisons. For IL treatment, samples were immersed in 10 vol% IL solutions for 1 to 2 hours, followed by drying on Kimwipes paper. Figure 1 shows the effect of IL treatment on spent black tea with different solvents: ethanol and deionized water. After ethanolic IL solution treatment, the overall charging was effectively reduced and topographical contrast improved, but the uneven distribution of the IL introduced non-uniform contrast as an artifact due to the rapid evaporation of the solvent. In contrast, after aqueous IL solution treatment, non-uniform contrast artifacts were avoided, but the topography contrast remained poor, possibly due to less surface IL thickness. The optimal IL solution was found at a concentration of 10 vol% in a mixture of ethanol and water at a volume ratio of 3:1. The optimal treatment time was found to be 2 h for spent black tea and 1 h for pinecone scales to ensure IL infiltration and desorption of water-soluble contents. The difference in treatment time can be attributed to the different plant structures and compositions. Figure 2 shows the comparison of spent black tea and ground pinecone before and after optimized IL treatment. For both samples, some morphological features were slightly displaced, but the overall structure remained unchanged, confirming the viability and stability of the IL. Samples before treatment had poor contrast due to residual charging, but in both cases after the optimized IL treatment, a uniformly thin IL coating on the surface of the sample was able to conform to the surface features, suppress charging, and greatly enhance the perceived three-dimensionality. This work provides a simple and low-cost IL treatment of biomass specimen preparation for SEM imaging based on [EMI][MeSO3] with solvent optimization. The combination of IL treatment and LVSEM demonstrates the benefit of enhanced surface sensitivity and topography contrast. The similar methodology can be applied to other liquid-absorbing specimens and IL formulations. The comparison method based on low-dose can be applied to many electrically non-conductive but vacuum-stable materials to expand the application of IL treatment and verify the dimensional stability of the samples [6]. (a) Stomata on spent black tea after 10 vol% ethanolic IL treatment. (b) Stomata on spent black tea after 10 vol% aqueous IL treatment. Both were cropped from the 1280*960 pixel original images captured at an acceleration voltage of 1 kV and a probe current of 7 pA, with signals collected in line integration mode using the upper secondary electron detector. (a) Stomata on spent black tea before IL (b) the same stomata after optimized IL treatment (c)Pinecone scale before IL treatment (d) the same pit on the pinecone scale after IL treatment. All images were cropped from the 1280*960-pixel original images captured at an acceleration voltage of 1 kV and a probe current of 7 pA, with signals collected in line integration mode using the upper secondary electron detector.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,267
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMicroscopy and MicroanalysisMême sujetElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207