Discussion: Successful Use of WALANT in Local and Regional Soft Tissue Flaps: A Case Series
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This article from New York by Dr. Connors and colleagues is a January 2023 publication of a series of 21 patients who all had successful outcomes with local or regional soft tissue flap surgery using the wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique with lidocaine and epinephrine anesthesia and no sedation.1 It is worth listing that they performed two posterior tibial artery perforator propeller flaps, two reverse radial forearm flaps, two Quaba flaps, six cross finger flaps, one reverse homodigital island flap, three first dorsal metacarpal artery flaps, two thenar flaps, and two Moberg flaps. This article is very important for three main reasons. Firstly, despite ample evidence that epinephrine 1:100,000 is safe in fingers and elsewhere,1,2 the myth that low-dose epinephrine causes tissue loss is still prevalent enough that many surgeons are still worried about using it when raising flaps, for fear of flap necrosis. This is part of the reason that some of the first flap elevation articles by Prasetyono3 used a very low dose of epinephrine (1:1,000,000) to err on the safe side. Dr. Connors’ group used 1:100,000 in the current study without flap tissue loss. Interestingly, low-dose epinephrine is cardiac muscle protective when injected directly into coronary arteries.4,5 The second and globally important reason that this article is very significant is that the WALANT technique will make flap surgery much more available in many African countries where patients cannot get these important procedures because they cannot afford them, and because anesthesiologists are in very short supply. WALANT eliminates the costs of unnecessary tourniquet and sedation. Evidence-based sterility permits many procedures to be moved to minor procedure rooms.6,7 As a result, surgery is now becoming affordable for many patients in Africa.8 This recent publication will provide further impetus to enable more patients to get flap surgery in emerging countries. It is worth mentioning that most African countries have very few plastic surgeons. Dr. Connors and her group in New York are orthopedic surgeons. This will also help encourage nonplastic surgeons in emerging countries to use these flaps. The third reason this article is important is that it is published in an open access journal. This makes it available to all the surgeons of the world who need it the most. “Pay for subscription” journals may often have a higher “impact factor” in academic terms. However, unless they can afford the subscription or belong to a university who can get it for them, most surgeons of the emerging nations have no way to see these publications. This article that I have had the pleasure of discussing will have true impact. DISCLOSURE The author has no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».