MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4385233939 · doi:10.1353/nyh.2023.a902926

The Market in Birds: Commercial Hunting, Conservation, and the Origins of Wildlife Consumerism 1850–1920 by Andrea L. Smalley (review)

2023· article· en· W4385233939 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Darryl McGrath

Notice bibliographique

RevueNew York History · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Science and Medicine
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConsumerismWildlifeArtGeographyArt historyArchaeologyHistoryEnvironmental ethicsEcologyPolitical scienceLawBiologyPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Market in Birds: Commercial Hunting, Conservation, and the Origins of Wildlife Consumerism 1850–1920 by Andrea L. Smalley Darryl McGrath (bio) The Market in Birds: Commercial Hunting, Conservation, and the Origins of Wildlife Consumerism 1850–1920 By Andrea L. Smalley with Henry M. Reeves, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2022. 307 pages. $59.95 hardcover and e-book. The most riveting impression that a reader takes away from The Market in Birds is the mental image of millions of bird carcasses—frozen in warehouses, compressed into barrels or piled in boats—all on their way to being eaten or deplumed, or stuffed and mounted. The book delivers this image in a straightforward, almost dispassionate narrative that nevertheless makes the reader cringe at the sheer extent of the carnage from a particularly grim chapter in this country's environmental history: seventy years of destruction of the country's once-vast populations of wild birds for consumption as delicacies, for decorations on women's hats, and for private collections of eggshells and mounted specimens. The grim tallies boggle the mind: 35,000 ducks killed in Virginia in 1900 with the help of the newly invented semiautomatic shotgun. Forty thousand passenger pigeons, which were being shipped live for use in target shooting contests, dead from dehydration in a rail car in the 1880s. In Minnesota, 25,810 pounds of dead birds were shipped in just two months alone in 1876. And in one unforgettable passage, the stench of decaying dead birds almost smacks the reader in the face in an account of the frequent failures of early forms of freezer storage. A series of such losses for one dealer culminated with him dumping hundreds of rotting bird carcasses on the prairie from whence many of them had come, with no concept of a teachable moment but plenty of exasperation over his lost profits. This book is neither a fast read nor a casual, entertaining one. It is also not a book likely to appeal to an amateur birder, with its references to the Progressive Era conservation [End Page 228] movement, its detailed accounts of state and federal court battles, and its description of what the authors call "the tangled connections between ecology, economy, culture, and law that the market had thrown into sharp relief." Instead, The Market in Birds is more likely to serve as an extremely important reference for academics and conservationists that carefully sets out the authors' theory of the complex relationship between the country's wild resources and the consumers who, had their lives depended on it, could not have identified a living version of the roasted American Woodcock that appeared on their dinner plates in a nineteenth century New York City restaurant. Completely unregulated in its early years, the market-hunting era decimated bird populations and contributed to the extinction of several species, including the Carolina Parakeet, the Passenger Pigeon, and the Labrador Duck, which was rare even before its carcasses started appearing in urban game markets. The slaughter was slowed by a series of state and federal laws and court decisions, mostly in the twentieth century, and finally came to an end in 1918, with the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which remains in effect today. The publication of The Market in Birds is its own remarkable story. Lead author and historian Andrea L. Smalley, a professor emerita at Northern Illinois University, based the finished manuscript on the work of the late Henry M. Reeves, a renowned biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Reeves died in 2013 and left an unfinished manuscript and extensive research on the market in birds. Smalley was introduced to Reeves's family, acquired his materials, and used them as the foundation of the final book. Completing another writer's work is exceptionally difficult, and the Reeves family acknowledges that with gratitude in the foreword. As the author of an earlier book on the effect of American colonization on wildlife, Smalley was well-suited to the task. Every story like this needs a villain or a hero, and Reeves found his villain in Henry Clay Merritt. A nineteenth century market hunter of birds turned dealer in game...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,381
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,191 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNew York HistoryMême sujetHistory of Science and MedicineTravaux en français237 207