Introduction: The Performative Force of Practice-Based Research
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As any artist, researcher, teacher, athlete, or home cook knows, one often discovers what is most enriching and affirming in one's practice when it is disrupted or curtailed in some manner.Likewise, adaptations made in response to such circumstances, however pragmatic, temporary, or instrumentalist, can frequently lead to a fundamental rethinking of some of the core concepts and tenets of a practice.For many of us, COVID-19 was just such a reckoning.It forced us to pivot radically in our personal and professional lives; while this has undoubtedly affected our individual approaches to all that we do, as the contributions to this special double issue of Performance Matters attest, for many of us, the pandemic has also strengthened and reaffirmed our attachments to our communities of practice.Indeed, COVID had much to do with the genesis of this volume.More specifically, it builds on a two-day international summit on practice-based research (PBR) organized by Ellen Waterman and Nina Sun Eidsheim and held online in the summer of 2021. 1 Thirty-six artists/scholars held a series of thematic conversations exploring the opportunities, challenges, and exciting uncharted territory of PBR through four broad nodes: knowledge, power, ethics, and affect.As part of a collective writing exercise on Google Docs that concluded the summit, and that explored possible takeaways and next steps for participants, Peter Dickinson volunteered this journal as a venue to build on the energy of the summit through a PBR-themed issue.Ellen and Peter duly drafted a call for papers inviting artists/scholars working in/with PBR to expand on the 2021 summit nodes, or to introduce new ones through a range of artistic media and writing.In doing so, we were especially eager to marry the inter-, multi-, and transdisciplinary methods of PBR with the journal's particular focus on the materiality and consequentiality of performance-that is, what PBR does and why it is meaningful.Hence our foundational question for the issue: What is the performative force of practice-based research?For example, what exactly is produced when universal design principles are explored through music, when intergenerational trauma is examined through dance, or when performance art is used to probe the effects of climate change?The darker meaning that "performative" took on during the pandemic also lurks beneath such questions.While we remain committed to the Austinian sense of the citational performative (whether linguistic or artistic) as "doing something" in the world (Austin 1962), several of the papers in this issue critique moments when the performative becomes an empty form of virtue signalling.Whether it is termed practice-based or practice-led research, practice-as-research, research-creation, or simply artistic research, the underlying proposition of the various methodologies we here call PBR is that creative practices may be used to seek out knowledge while also challenging the epistemological assumptions that produce the concept "research."In other words, creative practices such as music,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,044 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle