Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I fi rst met Sarah in the spring of 2018 when she was looking to get involved in a group that began its work over a decade ago called the Criminalization and Punishment Education Project, which aims to reduce the use and harms of policing and imprisonment, as well as build safer communities through research on and advocacy for alternatives.At the time, Sarah was new to Ottawa and, with a background of research and advocacy on overdose prevention sites, she was looking to get involved in community organizing to work in solidarity with people who struggle to meet their basic needs and, in the process, enhance our collective well-being and safety.Early conversations with Sarah led to the creation of the Jail Accountability & Information Line in December 2018.Sarah played a key role in launching this initiative and running the hotline that took thousands of calls from people imprisoned at the Ottawa-Carleton Detention Centre in its early years.Through this initiative, Sarah worked with imprisoned people on various human rights and re-entry issues they faced, including getting access to medical care behind and beyond bars.For instance, I recall the early days of the hotline where Sarah literally spent days advocating for a person who had fallen off the bunk in their jail cell to the concrete fl oor and broke their leg to get transferred to a hospital so that he could get examined and get access the care he needed that was being denied by jail staff and management who did not believe him.I also recall numerous instances where Sarah arranged for doctor's appointments for people coming out of the jail to ensure that their opioid substitution prescriptions would continue once they were released so that they would not turn to street drugs, and potentially overdose and die.There is no doubt Sarah saved lives that through her community organizing and advocacy.In 2019, Sarah became Dialogue Editor for the Journal of Prisoners on Prisons, which is a section aimed at bringing various people with lived expertise of imprisonment in conversation with each other to advance thought and praxis on a particular challenge facing prisoners.Among the contributions Sarah made in this role was the publication of Volume 28, Number 2 of the journal featuring a dialogue on "Prison (In)justice in Canada at the Crossroads", which served as a clarion call for changes to federal imprisonment in the country that remain needed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».