Susan D. Dion, Braided Learning: Illuminating Indigenous Presence through Art and Story
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Susan Dion offers readers opportunities to engage in relational learning through traditional Indigenous pedagogies of art and story.Dion writes this book as a response to her understanding that Indigenous children and peoples are acutely aware of the lack of historical and cultural knowledge of Indigenous peoples in the settler Canadian mind.Through her writing, she creates a more relational form of allyship and reconciliation and situates art and story as the method through which current narratives should be disrupted to restore balance to our shared history and relationship.An honest conversation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples is a primary theme throughout this work.The writing is abrupt and gentle, being truthful about the ways settlers perpetuate continued settler colonial violence, while simultaneously inviting readers into relationship and providing a starting place to repair the broken relationship.In her introduction, Dion provides anecdotes of ignorant and racist experiences she and students she has worked with have suffered, enabled by stereotypical, romanticized, and historicized images found in and perpetuated by Canadian educational curricula and teacher practices.At the same time, Dion recognizes how the work of Indigenous peoples has transformed Canadian mindsets towards a desire to revisit these stories and better understand the truth.She notes, "We agree that the stories we hear and do not hear -the stories we tell and do not tell, about ourselves and each other -matter a great deal."(10).As such, Dion appeals to the reader to be responsible listeners, who, from an Indigenous episteme, do not interrupt the speaker, and instead listen to the whole story, from which they can gain their own insights about themselves.From this, Dion positions settler educators as responsible for learning and teaching the true history of relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples for reconciliation to be possible.In her first chapter she outlines four requisites: implication, investment, shared interest, and impact.The chapters that follow provide opportunities for readers to begin or continue their own learning.The first requisite, implication, establishes the responsibility of recognizing self as implicated in this shared history and, if one is a settler, as a beneficiary of the privileges of colonialism.To aid the reader in understanding this process, Dion offers three settler stories -one from a settler working in the field of education, one from a first-generation immigrant, and another from a settler who works for a Canadian government department directly responsible for relations with Indigenous peoples.The stories demonstrate humility in learning and allow readers to recognize themselves in the stories, while also teaching important lessons.For example, one author writes about how their perspective was shaken and their ignorance noted on several occasions while another notes the need for all Canadians to unlearn the Indian Act.The following chapters provide opportunities for the readers to engage further with learning from this new understanding of their place within an
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,014 | 0,012 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».