MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4385562443 · doi:10.1353/nyh.2023.a902917

Warfare and Logistics along the US-Canadian Border during the War of 1812 by Christopher D. Dishman (review)

2023· article· en· W4385562443 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samuel J. Watson

Notice bibliographique

RevueNew York History · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistoryPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Warfare and Logistics along the US-Canadian Border during the War of 1812 by Christopher D. Dishman Samuel J. Watson (bio) Warfare and Logistics along the US-Canadian Border during the War of 1812 By Christopher D. Dishman. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2022. 334 pages. $39.95 hardcover. The War of 1812 has been interpreted in a surprising variety of ways, largely depending, of course, on an author's perspective. Although classically, or popularly, seen as an American defeat, the last half-century of scholarship has recognized decisive U.S. victories against Native Americans in the Northwest and Southwest. And the United States did win many of its battles in 1814 (and even a few in 1813), suggesting that experience did improve its generals, troop training, and tactical performance. Yet the United States did not achieve the strategic objectives set out by President Madison: to seize Canada (meaning the St. Lawrence Valley and present-day western Ontario, along the shores of Lakes Ontario and Erie) as a bargaining chip to trade for British concessions that would protect American sailors and trade from impressment and seizure. Westerners were delighted by the defeat of Tecumseh and the Red Stick Creeks, but the defense of Baltimore and Lake Champlain might not have been enough to salve the sting of a burned capitol, had it not been for another western victory at New Orleans. The U.S. government recognized the deficiencies of its war effort by rechartering the Bank of the United States and imposing a tariff on foreign manufactured goods in 1816, by retaining and continuing to build several very large warships, by developing plans for a new system of coastal fortifications to build on the success of Fort McHenry, and by instituting a military reform effort that included new standard operating procedures, tactical standardization, and a new emphasis on military education, which would make West Point the commissioning source for almost all new officers during the 1820s. Among the most important reforms was the retention of a disproportionately large cadre of experienced logisticians—quartermasters, ordnance officers, purchasing officers, and engineers—who would survey new military roads along the frontiers. Christopher Dishman's new book helps explain why. Although most of Warfare and Logistics along the US-Canadian Border is a narrative of military battles, campaigns, and strategy, Dishman provides the fullest account of logistics available, and he does so for both sides and for both navies and armies. There are some surprising absences in his sources: he does not cite Richard Barbuto's work—neither Niagara 1814 (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2000) nor New York's War of 1812 (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2021)—; nor does he cite the U.S. Army's official history of the Quartermaster Department, by Erna Risch; the biographies of Winfield Scott, by Timothy Johnson and Allan Peskin; or the major works on the U.S. Army before the War of 1812, by Richard Kohn, Theodore Crackel, [End Page 208] and James R. Jacobs. Dishman cites J. C. A. Stagg's books, but not his important articles on the officers and soldiers of the U.S. Army. Yet most of these lacunae can be forgiven, for Dishman provides both a very clear, highly detailed, and smoothly written operational narrative and comprehensive context for logistics along the Canadian border. Warfare and Logistics along the US-Canadian Border is not a technical analysis of logistics, for which many readers will probably be grateful. Many of Dishman's points about logistics will be familiar: due to the limited local population density and agricultural surplus, most supplies had to be sent from outside the region, through limited road networks on both sides of the border, making supplies costly, often scarce, and slow to arrive. Dishman moves quickly from mobilization to war, with a limited analysis of the strategic level of logistics and the financing of the war; here Max M. Edling, A Hercules in the Cradle: War, Money, and the American State, 1783–1867 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014) would have been a valuable resource. Dishman's conclusions, that the United States had the advantage in shipbuilding on the Great Lakes due to a greater...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,689
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,239
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNew York HistoryMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207