MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4385591478 · doi:10.1353/esc.2020.a903566

"That Men Might Listen Earnestly to It": Hearing Blackness

2020· article· en· W4385591478 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kristin Moriah

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMusic History and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésActive listeningSilenceWhite (mutation)AestheticsMeaning (existential)EntertainmentSociologyHistoryVisual artsPsychologyArtCommunication

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

"That Men Might Listen Earnestly to It":Hearing Blackness Kristin Moriah (bio) Listening to Black culture and Black music is so ubiquitous that the act of listening to Blackness can seem facile and its nuances can go unnoticed. But listening to Blackness entails forms of critical apprehension that carry different valences across different frequencies. "Listen" can be a command, an invocation, or a plea. In progressive political discourses about anti-racism and anti-Blackness, we are asked to listen for sounds that go unnoticed by others; to listen for dissonance; to listen to music; to listen to protest; to listen for signs of life. And yet, there is still so much to be said about Black sonic phenomena, like the way "I Can't Breathe," Eric Garner's last words, are now the title of an R&B song and a protest chant. Thus, the complex and shifting meaning of Black sounds and occasions to listen to Black culture pose significant critical challenges. At the same time, the misapprehension of Black sounds and sonic forms carries profound consequences and can contribute to enduring forms of subjection. Here, I am thinking of the way Matthew Morrison uses the term "Blacksound" to refer to "the legacies, sounds, and movements of African American bodies—both real and imagined—on which blackface performance and popular entertainment was based" (18) and finds copious examples of Blacksound in the present. Or the way Jennifer Stoever argues that beginning in the nineteenth century, racist listening practices offered [End Page 291] "white elites a new method of grounding racial abjection in the body while cultivating white listening practices as critical, discerning, delicate and, above all, as the standard of citizenship and personhood (5). Following Kevin Quashie, given that being "heard" can also be fraught with danger, and that certain aspects of Black vernacular culture flourish outside of the range of dominant culture, I am struck by the way inaudibility, or sonic inscrutability, emerges as a significant aspect of Black sounding worlds and Black literature, where listening is often related to the struggle to sound or to be heard correctly, even while retaining autonomy and privacy. I note that the struggle to sound publicly, and to be perceived accurately, forms the bedrock of Black literature in North America and creates a bridge to literature across the Black diaspora. It might feel like a digression, but I hope that an anecdote about the insistence upon the importance of being heard taken from Black print culture will ground my argument and smooth the way here. As Sylvia Wynter says, "we are a storytelling species" (McKittrick 9). And you are, by extension, my listeners. In spring 1848 the Frederick Douglass' Paper entered a literary fray and marshalled the power of listening to argue for the cultural relevance of anti-slavery lyrics and verse. In an unsigned editorial, preeminent American literary critic Rufus W. Griswold was excoriated for not including abolitionist poetry in The Poets and Poetry of America (1842), an anthology of American poetry that was one of the earliest and most important of its kind. Griswold's nationalist literary project would help to define American literature and culture for years to come. According to Albert D. Pionke, "as a nation, Griswold's United States accrued intellectual status by virtue of counting among its citizens … a diversely talented ensemble of critics, publishers, and writers" (320). Frederick Douglass's interlocutors were well aware of the importance of Griswold's anthology and of the implications of their exclusion. But perhaps even more fascinating than their conviction that abolitionist verses were foundational to American national literary projects was the recourse to sound in their very appeal to Griswold and his like. The editorial provides us with an opportunity to consider the politics of listening and hearing and how they have been marshalled by Black writers in North America. And so, the Frederick Douglass' Paper writers bemoan the notable absence of even one "line of good anti-slavery song; for be it known to the lovers of good songs, that some of the best ever sung, are those to be heard in the happy homes of abolitionists, and our great anti-slavery gatherings." The editorial...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,039

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,011
Communication savante0,0050,005
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,129
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,122 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in Canada→Même sujetMusic History and Culture→Travaux en français237 207→