S192: TALQUETAMAB (TAL) + DARATUMUMAB (DARA) IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA (RRMM): UPDATED TRIMM-2 RESULTS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Tal is a T-cell redirecting bispecific antibody (BsAb) targeting G protein–coupled receptor family C group 5 member D. Dara is an anti-CD38 mAb with direct on-tumor and immunomodulatory actions. Combining immunomodulatory effects of tal + dara may lead to synergistic efficacy. Initial TRIMM-2 (NCT04108195) results showed that SC tal RP2Ds, 0.4 mg/kg QW or 0.8 mg/kg Q2W, + SC dara had promising efficacy and increased CD38+/CD8+ T cells and proinflammatory cytokines. Aims: We report updated results from TRIMM-2 with additional pts and longer follow-up. Methods: All pts provided informed consent. Pts had MM, ≥3 prior lines of therapy (LOT; including a proteasome inhibitor [PI] and immunomodulatory drug [IMiD]) or were double refractory to a PI and IMiD, and had not received anti-CD38 therapy in ≤90 d. Pts received tal RP2Ds with step-up dosing + dara 1800 mg per approved schedule. AEs were graded per CTCAE v5.0; cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded per ASTCT guidelines. Responses were assessed per IMWG criteria. Results: As of Dec 12, 2022 (N=65), median follow-up was 11.5 mo (range 1.0–27.3). Median age was 63 y (range 37–81); 18% of pts had high-risk cytogenetics; 25% had extramedullary plasmacytomas. Median prior LOT was 5 (range 2–16): 63% penta-drug exposed; 58% triple-class refractory. Prior treatments included anti-CD38 (88% [77% refractory]), anti-BCMA (54% [38%]), BsAb (25% [25%]), and anti-BCMA CAR-T (17% [2%]) therapy. All pts had ≥1 AE (grade [Gr] 3/4 78%), most commonly CRS (78%; all Gr 1/2), dysgeusia (75%), dry mouth (55%), anemia (52%), fatigue (45%), and skin exfoliation (45%). CRS had a median time to onset of 1 d after the most recent dose with median duration of 2 d. 63% of pts had infections (Gr 3/4 22%; Gr 5 3% [n=2 pneumonia, possibly related to tal + dara]). 38% of pts had neutropenia (Gr 3/4 26%). 85% had postbaseline IgG <500 mg/dL; of these, 32% received IVIg. ICANS occurred in 3 pts (5%; all Gr 1/2 and resolved in 1–2 d). ORR was 78% (66% ≥VGPR; 45% ≥CR) across RP2Ds (100% in anti-CD38 naïve pts), and responses deepened over time. In pts exposed/refractory to prior therapy, ORRs were 75%/76% for anti-CD38, 74%/64% for anti-BCMA, and 75%/75% for BsAb. Median time to first response was 1 mo (range 0.9–8.3); at 12 mo, 86% of responders (89% of pts with ≥CR) still had responses. At data cutoff, 84% of responders remain on therapy (83%/82% anti-CD38 exposed/refractory). mPFS was 19.4 mo; 12-mo PFS and OS rates were 76% and 93%, respectively. Summary/Conclusion: Steroid-sparing tal + dara showed deep and durable responses with promising mPFS in heavily pretreated pts with RRMM, including pts refractory to anti-CD38/BCMA and T-cell redirecting therapy, suggesting combined immunomodulatory actions can yield robust responses in pts with refractory disease. The safety profile was clinically manageable; no new signals were identified with longer follow-up. © 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. Reused with permission. This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting. All rights reserved. Keywords: CD38, Bispecific, Multiple myeloma, G-protein-coupled receptors
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».