S192: TALQUETAMAB (TAL) + DARATUMUMAB (DARA) IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA (RRMM): UPDATED TRIMM-2 RESULTS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Tal is a T-cell redirecting bispecific antibody (BsAb) targeting G protein–coupled receptor family C group 5 member D. Dara is an anti-CD38 mAb with direct on-tumor and immunomodulatory actions. Combining immunomodulatory effects of tal + dara may lead to synergistic efficacy. Initial TRIMM-2 (NCT04108195) results showed that SC tal RP2Ds, 0.4 mg/kg QW or 0.8 mg/kg Q2W, + SC dara had promising efficacy and increased CD38+/CD8+ T cells and proinflammatory cytokines. Aims: We report updated results from TRIMM-2 with additional pts and longer follow-up. Methods: All pts provided informed consent. Pts had MM, ≥3 prior lines of therapy (LOT; including a proteasome inhibitor [PI] and immunomodulatory drug [IMiD]) or were double refractory to a PI and IMiD, and had not received anti-CD38 therapy in ≤90 d. Pts received tal RP2Ds with step-up dosing + dara 1800 mg per approved schedule. AEs were graded per CTCAE v5.0; cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded per ASTCT guidelines. Responses were assessed per IMWG criteria. Results: As of Dec 12, 2022 (N=65), median follow-up was 11.5 mo (range 1.0–27.3). Median age was 63 y (range 37–81); 18% of pts had high-risk cytogenetics; 25% had extramedullary plasmacytomas. Median prior LOT was 5 (range 2–16): 63% penta-drug exposed; 58% triple-class refractory. Prior treatments included anti-CD38 (88% [77% refractory]), anti-BCMA (54% [38%]), BsAb (25% [25%]), and anti-BCMA CAR-T (17% [2%]) therapy. All pts had ≥1 AE (grade [Gr] 3/4 78%), most commonly CRS (78%; all Gr 1/2), dysgeusia (75%), dry mouth (55%), anemia (52%), fatigue (45%), and skin exfoliation (45%). CRS had a median time to onset of 1 d after the most recent dose with median duration of 2 d. 63% of pts had infections (Gr 3/4 22%; Gr 5 3% [n=2 pneumonia, possibly related to tal + dara]). 38% of pts had neutropenia (Gr 3/4 26%). 85% had postbaseline IgG <500 mg/dL; of these, 32% received IVIg. ICANS occurred in 3 pts (5%; all Gr 1/2 and resolved in 1–2 d). ORR was 78% (66% ≥VGPR; 45% ≥CR) across RP2Ds (100% in anti-CD38 naïve pts), and responses deepened over time. In pts exposed/refractory to prior therapy, ORRs were 75%/76% for anti-CD38, 74%/64% for anti-BCMA, and 75%/75% for BsAb. Median time to first response was 1 mo (range 0.9–8.3); at 12 mo, 86% of responders (89% of pts with ≥CR) still had responses. At data cutoff, 84% of responders remain on therapy (83%/82% anti-CD38 exposed/refractory). mPFS was 19.4 mo; 12-mo PFS and OS rates were 76% and 93%, respectively. Summary/Conclusion: Steroid-sparing tal + dara showed deep and durable responses with promising mPFS in heavily pretreated pts with RRMM, including pts refractory to anti-CD38/BCMA and T-cell redirecting therapy, suggesting combined immunomodulatory actions can yield robust responses in pts with refractory disease. The safety profile was clinically manageable; no new signals were identified with longer follow-up. © 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. Reused with permission. This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting. All rights reserved. Keywords: CD38, Bispecific, Multiple myeloma, G-protein-coupled receptors
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».