P882: POMALIDOMIDE, DARATUMUMAB, AND DEXAMETHASONE AFTER LENALIDOMIDE TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA (RRMM): FINAL OVERALL SURVIVAL ANALYSIS OF THE PHASE 2 MM-014 STUDY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Topic: 14. Myeloma and other monoclonal gammopathies - Clinical Background: Treatment (Tx) choice after first line of Tx (LoT) is important for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). The MM Tx landscape has evolved, but there is no consensus on optimal sequence. Nearly all pts with MM receive lenalidomide (LEN) in first or second LoT; pts with RRMM who have exhausted LEN benefits require improved options. The phase 2 MM-014 trial (NCT01946477) explored outcomes of pomalidomide (POM)-based Tx in early LoT for RRMM. In cohort B, at a median follow-up of 28.4 mo, POM+daratumumab (DARA)+low-dose dexamethasone (DEX; DPd) showed promising efficacy, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 77.7% and median progression-free survival of 30.8 mo (Bahlis. Leuk Lymphoma 2022). Aims: To report final overall survival (OS) in MM-014 cohort B at a median follow-up of 41.9 mo. Methods: MM-014 had 3 cohorts. In cohort B, pts aged ≥18 y with RRMM who had received 1–2 prior LoT with LEN-based regimen as their most recent were eligible. Pts received DPd in 28-d cycles: POM 4 mg orally daily on d 1–21; DEX 40 mg (age ≤75 y) or 20 mg orally (age >75 y) on d 1, 8, 15, and 22; DARA intravenously 16 mg/kg body weight on d 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycles 1–2, d 1 and 15 of cycles 3–6, and d 1 of cycle 7 and beyond. The primary endpoint was ORR. OS and safety were secondary endpoints. OS was calculated as the time from start of Tx until time of death from any cause; pts were censored at the date last known to be alive. Dose interruptions and reductions were allowed for certain Tx-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Pts were followed for OS, subsequent Tx, and second primary malignancies for up to 5 y after the last pt was enrolled. Results: Among 112 pts enrolled in cohort B, 85 (75.9%) had disease refractory to LEN and 27 (24.1%) had relapsed disease following LEN; 69 (61.6%) and 43 (38.4%) had received 1 and 2 prior LoT, respectively. At a median follow-up of 41.9 mo (range, 0.4–73.1), 96 (85.7%) pts had discontinued Tx, mostly due to disease progression (n=54 [48.2%]). Pts received POM, DEX, and DARA for median durations of 15.7 (range, 0.3–73.1), 13.7 (range, <0.1–72.5), and 15.2 (range, <0.1–72.7) mo, respectively. Fifty (44.6%) pts died, mostly due to disease progression (n=28 [25.0%]). Median OS was 56.7 mo (95% CI, 46.5–not reached [NR]) (Figure). Median OS was 53.6 mo (95% CI, 28.6–NR) among pts refractory to their most recent prior LEN-based Tx and NR (95% CI, 47.6–NR) among pts who experienced relapse. TEAEs leading to discontinuation of POM, DEX, or DARA occurred in 7 (6.3%), 9 (8.0%), and 6 (5.4%) pts, respectively. Additionally, 31 (27.7%) and 38 (33.9%) pts experienced Tx-related TEAEs leading to POM and DEX reduction, respectively, while 55 (49.1%), 17 (15.2%), and 65 (58.0%) experienced Tx-related TEAEs leading to POM, DEX, and DARA interruption, respectively. Neutropenia was the most common Tx-related TEAE leading to dose modification of POM (reduction, n=17 [15.2%]; interruption, n=38 [33.9%]) and DARA (interruption, n=30 [26.8%]); insomnia was the most common Tx-related TEAE leading to dose modification of DEX (reduction, n=10 [8.9%]; interruption, n=1 [0.9%]). Summary/Conclusion: With long-term follow-up, pts with RRMM treated with DPd demonstrated favorable OS. The safety profile of DPd was similar to previous reports with no new safety signals identified. These data suggest that DPd is beneficial for pts with RRMM who have exhausted benefits of LEN in earlier LoT.Keywords: Clinical trial, Imids, Survival, Multiple myeloma
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».