P627: LONG-TERM OUTCOMES WITH CONTINUOUS IBRUTINIB IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA: ANALYSIS OF TIME TO PROGRESSION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Over the past decade, the introduction of targeted agents like ibrutinib has resulted in advances in treatment and improved outcomes for patients with CLL. Ibrutinib is the only once-daily Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) therapy to demonstrate significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit in multiple phase 3 studies in patients with CLL. Compared with newer BTKis, ibrutinib has a comprehensive body of clinical and real-world data, providing a unique opportunity to assess long-term outcomes. Median PFS in the first-line (1L) RESONATE-2 study has not been reached after median 8 years of follow-up; a recent data analysis has also shown that patients treated with ibrutinib have similar OS estimates over an 8-year follow-up period as those from an age-matched general population (Ghia et al, ASH 2022). Aims: Since PFS is a combination of progression and survival events, we assessed the time to disease progression (PD) in previously untreated patients with CLL who were treated with ibrutinib, excluding patients who died prior to PD. Methods: Time to progression (TTP) was analyzed in a pooled data set comprising three 1L CLL clinical trials (RESONATE-2, ECOG1912, and iLLUMINATE) and included patients treated with continuous single-agent ibrutinib or an ibrutinib + anti-CD20 combination. Patients with a survival event prior to PD were censored per TTP definition. TTP was also assessed for patients who remained on treatment by censoring those who discontinued treatment for reasons other than PD. OS and safety were also evaluated. Results: A total of 603 patients received continuous ibrutinib treatment (single agent, n=136; anti-CD20 combination, n=467). Median (range) age was 63 years (31–89 years), and 65% of patients were male. Among patients with available genetic data, 10% (56/538) had del(17p)/TP53 mutation and 55% (334/603) had unmutated IGHV. Overall median follow-up for this analysis was 42 months, with respective median follow-up of 89, 46, and 38 months for RESONATE-2, iLLUMINATE, and ECOG1912. Of 603 patients treated with an ibrutinib-based regimen, 79 (13%) patients had PD at any time and 42 (7%) had PD while on ibrutinib treatment. Overall, the probability of remaining progression free at 8 years was 71% (95% CI, 62–78); in patients on active ibrutinib treatment until progression, the probability of remaining progression free at 8 years was 78% (95% CI, 69–85) (Figure). The 72-month OS probability (95% CI) was 76% (60–86) for patients who experienced PD at any time and 75% (54–87) for patients who experienced PD on treatment. Of the 600 patients included in the safety analysis, 171 (29%) had a grade ≥3 adverse event (AE). The 3 most frequent grade ≥3 AEs in each of the respective studies were previously published and included pneumonia, neutropenia, and anemia (RESONATE-2); neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and pneumonia (iLLUMINATE); and neutropenia, increased lymphocyte count, and hypertension (ECOG1912). Summary/Conclusion: Overall, 13% of previously untreated patients with CLL had PD with ibrutinib-based standard-of-care treatment at a median 42 months of follow-up. Only 7% of patients who remained on active ibrutinib treatment experienced PD, and the likelihood of remaining progression free at 8 years was 78%. No new safety signals were identified in published results of the respective studies. These data demonstrate that PD is a rare event for patients who remain on active ibrutinib treatment, and together with OS benefit established in multiple trials, contribute to the evidence of long-term outcomes with ibrutinib treatment.Keywords: ibrutinib, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».