Management of female stress urinary incontinence with single‐incision mini‐sling (Altis®): 36 month multicenter outcomes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PURPOSE: To assess noninferiority of the safety and effectiveness of the Altis® Single Incision Sling (SIS) with standard midurethral transobturator and/or retropubic slings through 36 months in a prospective, longitudinal, nonrandomized US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 522 cohort study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult females with confirmed predominant stress urinary incontinence (UI) through cough stress test (CST) or urodynamics and failed two noninvasive incontinence therapies. Effectiveness endpoints included objective dryness, negative CST, adverse events, and revision/resurgery through 36 months. The primary effectiveness endpoint was reduction from baseline in 24-h pad weight of ≥50% at 6 months, as requested by the FDA, and is included as a study point in this paper. Primary safety endpoint was rate of related serious adverse events (SAE) through 36 months. Noninferiority margins of 15% and 10% were prespecified for the effectiveness and safety endpoints. Due to the observational nature of the cohort study, a propensity methodology was conducted to assess the effect of potential confounding variables on the primary endpoints between groups. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-five women underwent the sling procedure (n = 184 Altis; n = 171 Comparator). One hundred fourty (76%) Altis subjects and 101 (59%) Comparator subjects completed follow-up through 36 months. At 36 months, for the effectiveness endpoint, the difference in proportions of -0.005 for Altis versus Comparator (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.102 to 0.092) was statistically significant (p = 0.002), supporting the hypothesis that Altis is noninferior to Comparator. Furthermore, both groups demonstrated high objective efficacy; in the Altis arm n = 99 (81.8%) subjects were a success, and in the Comparator arm, n = 79 (82.3%) subjects were a success. Additionally, regarding the CST, Altis was found to be noninferior to the Comparator at every study visit, and the rate of negative CST remained above 80% for both groups (p < 0.001). At 36 months, Altis (n = 2; 1.1%) and Comparator (n = 4; 2.3%) subjects experienced a device and/or procedure-related SAE. The difference in proportions of 0.013 for Altis versus Comparator (95% CI: -0.023 to 0.048) was statistically significant (p < 0.001), demonstrating that Altis is noninferior to Comparator with respect to the primary safety endpoint throughout the study. There were 62 (36.3%) retropubic midurethral slings (RMUS), 96 (56.1%) transobturator midurethral slings (TMUS), and 13 (7.6%) SIS slings in the Comparator group. For the 36 month effectiveness endpoint, assessing the noninferiority of Altis versus RMUS and Altis versus TMUS, 99 (81.8%) Altis and 37 (90.2%) RMUS were a success, trending toward statistical significance, however, it cannot be determined to be noninferior (p = 0.092). Ninty-nine (81.8%) Altis and 33 (71.7%) TMUS were a success; this was statistically significant (p < 0.001), demonstrating Altis was noninferior to TMUS. Rates of negative CST were 122 (87.1%) Altis, 40 (93.0%) RMUS (p < 0.001), and 44 (91.7%) TMUS (p < 0.001). CST demonstrated that Altis was noninferior to RMUS and Altis was noninferior to TMUS at 36 months. CONCLUSION: Altis single-incision sling was noninferior to standard midurethral sling for treatment of stress UI, throughout the study and at 36 months. Furthermore, adverse event rates were low.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».