Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As a child, I grew up in a warm supportive environment with nine brothers and a sister.Our parents never dissuaded us from the notion that we could do anything we wanted to as long as we worked hard enough to accomplish it.It never would have crossed my mind that this applied only to my brothers.I was a true believer in formal equality in the paid workforce.However, I also held the view that women should have a choice as to whether they ventured out into the paid workforce or whether they married and stayed at home to work.I don't recall thinking that men had this same choice.As an articling student and lawyer called to the bar in British Columbia and Alberta, I never personally experienced discrimination until I worked for the federal Department of Justice in Vancouver in 1983.Members of the Canadian Bar Association Task Force on Gender Equality in the Legal Profession tittered at the unintentional irony of my statement to them in January 1993, ten years after my experience at the Department of Justice.I was no Perry Mason in court, but as an articling student with the Department of Justice I had heard by the grapevine that a Provincial Court Judge in Vancouver had commented that I had "good courtroom presence."Two years previous, while articling in Calgary, I conducted a trial against a lawyer who had been called to the bar for seven years.He demanded to know where else I was called and was loath to believe this was the first trial of my short career as a lawyer.I was blatantly discriminated against at the Department of Justice when I applied for a position in the Criminal Section to follow my call to the bar in British Columbia.I was up against a man who had told men lawyers in the office that he would "never hire a woman as a prosecutor, because women aren't any good in court."To my face he was much nicer.He told me that I had an impressive résumé and good reports from other lawyers on my work as an articling student.However, he did want someone to start
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,372 | 0,199 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».