Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As is so often the case with research projects that eventually become books, the largest contributor to the success of this effort was passion.For as long as I can remember, I have looked into the night sky with a sense of bewilderment and pure wonder.More importantly, perhaps, as a child I relished the arrival of the annual family vacation to Florida, where at least one day of our retreat to Daytona was devoted to taking a very excited little boy down the coast and across the Indian River lagoon to the Kennedy Space Center.With a freshly stamped admission ticket in hand, I was unleashed among the exhibits to marvel at satellites and space capsules, lunar buggies and moon rocks.The exhibition on the "space transportation system" was my favourite.When I first observed this technological marvel in 1979, the space shuttle as it became commonly known had not yet launched into orbit.But the conceptual artwork surrounding the three-metre-tall model of the shuttle piggybacked on its boosters assured me that, when I was a "grown-up, " I had a very good chance of living and working in outer space just like Dr. Heywood R. Floyd in the famous movie 2001: A Space Odyssey.Despite still being grounded later in life, I continued to ask myself "How did we get into space?"and "Who or what might we some day discover there?"I knew, perhaps with a hint of disappointment, that the latter question would probably not be answered in my lifetime, but as a student of history, I did know that the former question could be more easily tackled.My undergraduate studies revealed to me that the origins of rocketry and spaceflight were born out of matters of defence, and upon entering the War Studies Program at the Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, in 1997, I decided to focus my graduate and post-graduate studies on science, technology, and international relations, with a particular interest in missile, rocketry, and space programs.This book had its genesis in my earlier examinations of the subject that focused upon much broader analyses of the relationship between the United States and Canada in matters related to missile and defence space programs.Among other things, it demonstrated that the two countries shared a rich history in scientific and technological cooperation, and that Canada's own efforts in early post-war rocketry, space science, and technology development were
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».