The Analysis of Capitalist Landownership: An Investigation of the Case of Great Britain (1977)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The boom and collapse of the land and property market in the early 1970s in Great Britain revealed a lack of knowledge and understanding of the present nature of private landownership by capital. The reaction of ‘the left’ (including that of the present author) to the events of that period was confused. One possible interpretation was to write off the political battle […] as just one more victory for industrial capital, in this case against the moribund remains of something called ‘landed property’. This latter, it was vaguely suspected, quite possibly still had feudal connections but was now virtually extinct, and certainly posed no major difficulties for capital. The problem with this interpretation – apart from incorrect assumptions of association between aristocracy, landownership and feudalism – was that it failed to answer the question of what role private landownership now plays in the British social formation. The assumption in fact appeared to be that landownership now played no structural role. But events themselves belied that view. […] The existing pattern of private landownership clearly was having contradictory repercussions on the wider processes of accumulation and of the reproduction of social relations. A common alternative view recognized the existence of such structural contradictions but attributed them to something variously entitled ‘the property sector’ and ‘landed capital’. The difficulty of this interpretation was that the definition and nature of this landed interest, and consequently of its specific economic and political effects, were left unanalysed. The research from which this paper stems was concerned to analyse both the present nature of private landownership by capital in Great Britain, and also the effects of such private landownership on a social formation dominated by capitalism. This paper will indicate some of the results of that enquiry and will also make some points on the interpretation of struggles over, and changes in, the form of landownership in such a social formation. […] [It contains] a brief outline and analysis […] of the present forms of landownership by private capital in Great Britain, and of their relative importance. An overall theme stresses […] [the significance of structural social relations and] the empirical study of such relations in concrete social formations […].
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».