I Will Live for Both of Us: A History of Colonialism, Uranium Mining, and Inuit Resistance by Joan Scottie, Warren Bernauer, and Jack Hicks (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: I Will Live for Both of Us: A History of Colonialism, Uranium Mining, and Inuit Resistance by Joan Scottie, Warren Bernauer, and Jack Hicks Riley Yesno (bio) I Will Live for Both of Us: A History of Colonialism, Uranium Mining, and Inuit Resistance by Joan Scottie, Warren Bernauer, and Jack Hicks University of Manitoba Press, 2022 it is always invigorating to find a book about Indigenous relationships with resource extraction that is firmly grounded in love and expertise gained through lived experience—I Will Live for Both of Us is such a book. The story is told from the first-person perspective of Joan Scottie, an Inuk woman and longtime community leader/activist, whose writing was aided by two non-Inuk researchers, Warren Bernauer and Jack Hicks. The three authors employ stories from Scottie's experiences of decades of front-line activism to provide readers with a thorough and accessible overview of community perspectives on mining in the Arctic and its relationship to settler colonialism. Scottie begins by retelling events and lessons from her own life and that of her family in Baker Lake, Nunavut, Canada. This section is emotionally moving and helpful in adding depth to later chapters. Indeed, Scottie's stories offer readers a glimpse into Inuit ways of life and their worldviews. As the book progresses, this glimpse makes especially clear how colonial industry and governments were able to mobilize their knowledge of Inuit worldviews to try to exploit communities for mineral resources. The remaining chapters focus on the decades of various consultation and negotiation processes between Inuit and the uranium industry/government. A particular focus is given to the tactics communities used to organize and oppose proponents of mining. Readers should anticipate that these later sections include many necessary but occasionally overwhelming details about the dozens of organizations and actors involved in the processes. In saying this, it is important to understand that this complexity is part of a lesson from the text. Put simply: if the multiple moving parts the authors traverse feel like a lot to keep track of for readers, even when laid out so plainly, one can imagine how much labor and overall diligence it took for Scottie and other Inuit leaders to keep on top of the developments over the decades. The chapters constitute a testament to the rigor and multifaceted nature of their community advocacy. [End Page 140] Overall, the authors have impressively and effectively included an extensive record of events, including dozens of actors over several decades. The authors' summarization skills are superb as are Scottie's recall and ability to interject feelings and memories associated with the numerous meetings and events discussed in the book. The approach keeps the reader grounded in the narrative while also providing plentiful background research. The text offers many valuable insights into community-led consultation, the importance of grassroots Indigenous activism, and the need to protect the rights of the land, animals, and people in the Far North. The main argument addresses how ongoing efforts to mine uranium in the Arctic are a continuation of settler colonialism—with especially devastating impacts on Inuit women. The argument is solidly supported by overviews of obvious violations of inherent Inuit rights, in addition to comparisons between the contemporary moment and some of Scottie's earliest memories about the onset of colonialism in the Arctic. The parallels in colonial objectives and Inuit resistance between these two times are insightful and indisputable. An interrelated secondary argument concerns how the current territorial government of Nunavut, often regarded as a form of Indigenous self-government by some scholars, is another form of colonial government operated by a greater number of Indigenous representatives. This argument may be particularly beneficial to those interested in Arctic governance and leaves room for more significant discussion about how Indigenous people define and operationalize self-government, and the limits of representation. One critique to note: other than in the opening chapter (and a brief mention near the end of the book), little in-depth attention is paid to how mining has specifically impacted Inuit women. This lack of investigation was unexpected, given how this impact was stated as an objective at the outset of...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».