Judgment Day: A Vignette
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
FOR CHRISTINE ST-PIERRE, a television reporter in the parliamentary bureau of Radio-Canada, CBC's French-language network, judgment day promised to be nerve-racking and chaotic.The case of John Robin Sharpe, an older man caught in possession of child pornography, had stirred a great deal of publicity and controversy.The decisions rendered by the lower courts had made headlines across the country.Police associations, parental groups, civil libertarians, feminists, and clerics had staked out their positions on the case.What made St-Pierre's job so difficult was that she would have to go on air at noon -almost the same time the judgment was being handed down.She had done as much preparation as she could prior to the decision.She had read a resume of the Sharpe case that had been prepared by the Supreme Court of Canada, she had reviewed press clippings about lower court decisions, and attended briefings given by the Department of Justice and by the court's executive legal officer, James O'Reilly.Although she sometimes speaks to experts, she hadn't had time to phone or consult with anyone beforehand. 1 The court handed down three decisions on Friday, 26 January 2001.Two of the judgments, a case in administrative law from Ontario (whether principles that had guided a particular set of labour relations board consultations had violated the rules of natural justice) and a criminal case from Newfoundland (whether a mentally challenged complainant had to be called as a witness), received no media coverage, evaporating from public view as soon as they were released.From a media perspective, these cases were dead on arrival.But the Sharpe case, which dealt with the possession of child pornography, had all the ingredients of a major news story.Sharpe, a retired city planner who lived in Vancouver and who had won some recognition as a writer, fit the popular conception of what a sex deviant might look like: old and dishevelled, and a bit decrepit.Far from being embarrassed by his perverse behaviour, Sharpe seemed to revel in it.For most Canadians, the case was primarily about ensuring that children are protected from the exploitation of pornographers.Emotions ran deep.For others, the Sharpe case was about freedom of expression.Of particular concern was whether creating diaries or drawings or visual materials for one's own use constituted criminal behaviour.However repugnant Sharpe's behaviour might be, his rights had to be protected.There was also the overhang of partisan politics.The Alliance Party had made the Sharpe case into a cause celebre.Pressure had mounted on the Liberal government to react strongly if the court ruled in [I]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,042 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,016 | 0,022 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».