Teledermatology in India During the Peri–COVID-19 Outbreak Period: Advantages, Shortcomings, and Challenges
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Telemedicine is defined as the use of electronic information and communication technologies for health care professionals to provide care to patients. Although available since the pre–COVID-19 era, a huge surge in teledermatology consultations occurred during the COVID-19 outbreak. As access to health care became limited and difficult due to repeated lockdowns, teledermatology helped us provide health care to our patients. Moreover, as dermatology is a visual field, it was even more suitable for teleconsultations. Objective The objectives of this study were to investigate the advantages, shortcomings, and challenges of teledermatology in India during the peri–COVID-19 outbreak period. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in India. Teledermatology consultation data from April 1, 2020, till September 2021 (18 months) were included. All modes, including real-time (RT) video, asynchronous store and forward (SAF), and hybrid, were used to conduct teledermatology consultations. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (IBM Corp). Results During these 18 months, a total of 4280 patients took teledermatology consultations at our center. The mean age of the patients was 34.19 years, with most of them (36.4%) in the age group of 31-40 years. The patient population comprised a mix of urban (55%) and rural (45%) individuals. Overall, 70% of consultations were conducted in the SAF mode; hybrid mode, 16%; and RT video consultations, 14%. Diagnosis was established in 89.1% of the cases, and the most common diagnosis was superficial fungal infection (28%), followed by eczema (16%) and acne (8.6%). Hospital visits were required in the remaining 10.9% of cases for the following reasons: lack of clear pictures and technical errors (5.57%). Additional diagnostic tests were required in 1.3% of cases, physical examination in 1.05% of cases, and 0.39% of patients had life-threatening conditions requiring hospitalization. The advantages of teledermatology include decreased need for hospital visits among 89.1% of patients, which played a very important role in decreasing overcrowding. Also, this helped us provide expert health care to the rural population of India. Owing to shortcomings including the lack of good-quality pictures (4.2%; more so in SAF teleconsultations) and technical errors (1.37%), teledermatology cannot be used to manage life-threatening conditions (0.39%), and, in particular, RT video consultations are more time-consuming (14%). Challenges faced by dermatologists during teledermatology consultations were mainly operational, such as the lack of good internet access leading to interrupted consultations (1.37%), poor quality of pictures (4.2%), and difficulty in extracting history in cases of SAF consultations. Conclusions Teledermatology serves as a triage platform and helps reduce hospital visits. It helps to cater to the rural population, which otherwise has limited access to health care. Some technical challenges are the dependence of teledermatology on pictures and information sent by the patient for establishing the diagnosis. Also, sometimes patients faced difficulty in conveying problems clearly to the doctors. Because of the ease and advantages, several dermatologists have continued to use teledermatology along with the physical consultations in the post–COVID-19 era. With a few advancements, teledermatology will certainly remain a successful and useful model for consultations, more so for catering to the population with the lack of access to specialist services. Conflicts of Interest None declared.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».