MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4386024134 · doi:10.1097/01.hs9.0000967716.49281.3f

S201: FINAL 7-YEAR FOLLOW UP AND RETREATMENT SUBSTUDY ANALYSIS OF MURANO: VENETOCLAX-RITUXIMAB (VENR)-TREATED PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (R/R CLL)

2023· article· en· W4386024134 sur OpenAlexaff
Arnon P. Kater, Rosemary Harrup, Thomas J. Kipps, Barbara Eichhorst, Carolyn Owen, Sarit Assouline, Nicole Lamanna, Tadeusz Robak, Javier de la Serna, Ulrich Jaeger, Guillaume Cartron, Marco Montillo, Clemens Mellink, Brenda Chyla, Maria Thadani‐Mulero, Marcus Lefebure, Yanwen Jiang, Rosemary Millen, Michelle Boyer, John F. Seymour

Notice bibliographique

RevueHemaSphere · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensJewish General HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicineBendamustineHazard ratioRituximabGastroenterologyConfidence intervalNeutropeniaMinimal residual diseaseChronic lymphocytic leukemiaSurgeryOncologyLeukemiaChemotherapyLymphoma

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: The Phase 3 MURANO trial (NCT02005471) reported superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with fixed-duration VenR vs bendamustine (B)R in patients (pts) with R/R CLL. At the 5-year update, the median (m)PFS was 53.6 vs 17.0 months (P<0.0001), and 5-year OS rates were 82.1% vs 62.2% (P<0.0001) in pts treated with VenR vs BR, respectively (Seymour et al. Blood 2022). Aims: We report the final analyses of MURANO, with 7 years median follow-up (FU): specifically, updated PFS and OS, with minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluation, in pts treated in the main study, as well as in VenR-retreated pts in the substudy. Methods: Pts with R/R CLL were randomized to VenR (Ven 400mg daily for 2 years + monthly R for the first 6 months) or BR (6 months). In the substudy (2018 onwards), pts with progressive disease (PD) received VenR (same schedule as main study) as either re-treatment or as crossover from BR. PFS data are by investigator assessment. Peripheral blood MRD was measured centrally by allele-specific oligonucleotide-PCR and/or flow cytometry, with a <10–4 threshold for undetectable (u)MRD. Results: Baseline characteristics are presented in the Table. At final data cutoff (3 August 2022), VenR-treated pts (n=194) had a mPFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 54.7 months (52.3, 59.9) vs 17.0 months (15.5, 21.7) for BR-treated pts (n=195; hazard ratio [HR] 0.25). Seven-year PFS rates (95% CI) were 23.0% (16.1, 29.9) with VenR, while no pts treated with BR remained progression-free at this time point; 7-year OS rates (95% CI) were 69.6% (62.8, 76.5) with VenR and 51.0% (43.3, 58.7) with BR (HR 0.53). Median time to next treatment with VenR was 63.0 months vs 24.0 months with BR (HR 0.30); 37.1% of VenR-treated pts have not received subsequent anti-CLL treatment. Among VenR-treated pts who had uMRD at end of treatment (EOT) without PD (n=83/118; 70.3%), mPFS (95% CI) from EOT was 52.5 months (44.5, 61.5) vs 18.0 months (8.5, 29.3; p<0.0001) in pts who were MRD+ at EOT (n=35; 29.7%). Fourteen (16.9%) pts had no PD nor confirmed MRD conversion at the 7-year update; in the 63 (75.9%) pts who had MRD conversion, median time to conversion (95% CI) was 19.4 months (8.7, 28.0). Among 63 pts who converted, 39 subsequently had PD or died; median time from conversion to PD (95% CI) was 28.3 months (23.2, 35.0). In the substudy (n=34), 25 pts received VenR re-treatment (Table), 92.0% of whom had at least one of the following high-risk features: IGHV-unmutated disease, genomic complexity, or del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations (Wu et al. EHA 2021); despite this, 14/25 (56.0%) achieved uMRD at EOT in the main study. Best overall response rate (ORR) to re-treatment was 72.0% and mPFS (95% CI) was 23.3 months (15.6, 24.3). Median (range) time between the last Ven dose in the main study and Ven ramp-up in the substudy was 2.3 (1.2–3.1) years. Eight (32.0%) pts achieved uMRD at the re-treatment end of combination treatment; however, no pts retained their uMRD status at the re-treatment EOT. No new safety findings were observed since the 5-year data cut. Summary/Conclusion: In this final long-term analysis of the MURANO trial, PFS and OS benefits for VenR over BR were sustained. Furthermore, achievement of uMRD was associated with prolonged PFS. In VenR-treated pts in the substudy, ORR was high and uMRD was still attainable in this high-risk population. Overall, these data continue to support the use of fixed-duration VenR in R/R CLL, and suggest that re-treatment with VenR is a viable option for pre-treated pts.Keywords: Retreatment, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Minimal residual disease (MRD), Venetoclax

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,320
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations15
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHemaSphereMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207