MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4386052241 · doi:10.1097/01.hs9.0000969572.68411.a2

P667: RISK OF PROGRESSION IN CHRONIC PHASE-CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA PATIENTS ELIGIBLE FOR TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITOR DISCONTINUATION: FINAL ANALYSIS OF THE TFR-PRO STUDY

2023· article· en· W4386052241 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Giovanni Paolo Maria Zambrotta, Sarit Assouline, Franck E. Nicolini, Elisabetta Abruzzese, Ester Pungolino, Maria Cristina Miggiano, Chiara Elena, Alberto Álvarez Larrán, Ana Triguero Moreno, Alessandra Iurlo, Cristina Bucelli, Francesca Lunghi, Isabella Capodanno, Margherita Maffioli, Sara Galimberti, Giovanni Caocci, Fabio Stagno, Susanne Saußele, Carmen Fava, Philipp le Coutre, Massimiliano Bonifacio, Veronica Guglielmana, Federica Colombo, Laura Antolinni, Carlo Gambacorti‐Passerini

Notice bibliographique

RevueHemaSphere · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiscontinuationMedicineMyeloid leukemiaInternal medicineObservational studyClinical endpointCohortOncologyPediatricsClinical trial

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Treatment discontinuation (TD) in patients (pts) with chronic phase (CP)-Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) is recognized as one goal in the management of the disease. TD is generally safe, since MMR is achieved in almost all cases when TKI resumption is required. Disease progression (DP) to accelerated or blast phase (AP/BP) after TD was considered virtually impossible. However, recent reports documented at least 12 such cases, some of which fatal, raising safety concerns about TD. Aims: A quantification of the risk of DP in the setting of TFR has never been evaluated. The TFR-PRO study was designed to obtain a numerical assessment of the risk of DP in pts in deep molecular response (DMR) eligible for TD, regardless of their decision to attempt TD. Methods: This retro-prospective observational study enrolled CP-CML pts, followed at 20 centers in Italy, Canada, Germany, Spain, France. Pts eligibility included ≥4 years of TKI treatment and ≥18 months of stable DMR. The primary objective was to assess the risk of DP expressed as time adjusted rate (TAR) and its relationship to TD in CML pts who underwent TD. Pts eligible to TD who did not discontinue constituted the reference cohort. A flexible statistical approach allowed to attribute pts to the two groups according to their situation about TD (TD yes or no). Events developing in pts after the end of TD were considered associated to TD if they developed within 36 months since the end of TD. One secondary endpoint was the TAR of molecular relapse (MR, i.e. loss of MMR). Results: From July 24th, 2020 to November 10th, 2022, 907 pts were registered, of whom 870 were evaluable for the analysis (5152 person years). Median follow up was 5.5 years (IQR 2.6-8.6), median age at diagnosis was 50 years (IQR 40-61). Sokal score was low in 46.3%, intermediate in 34.8% and high in 18.9%. 505 pts (58%) attempted TD, 365 (42%) did not. MR occurred in 172/505 (34.1%) pts after TD, for a TAR of 11.8/100 person years (95% confidence interval (CI) [10.1-13.7]), but also in 64/365 (17.5%) pts of the reference cohort, for a TAR of 2.3/100 person years (95%CI [1.8-3.0]), p<0.0001. A representation of the estimated proportion of pts with MR is provided in the figure. Only one pt experienced DP to lymphoid BP, 55 after the end of TFR; he received BMT and is presently in remission. This event developed more than 36 months after MR, which was the protocol limit for considering an event linked to TD. Therefore, at the time of DP this pt was contributing to the reference cohort. Thus, the risk of DP was 1/870 or 0.1% (95% CI [0.0-0.6]) in the overall cohort, ranging from 0/505 or 0%, (95% CI 0.0-0.6%]) in the discontinuation cohort to 1/365 or 0.3% (95% CI [0.0-1.5%]) in the reference cohort. The TAR of DP was 0.019/100 person years (95%CI [0.003-0.138]) in the overall cohort, ranging from 0.0 (95%CI [0-0.002]) in the discontinuation cohort to 0.030 (95%CI [0.004-0.215]) in the reference cohort. The difference of this risk between the two cohorts is not statistically significant. Summary/Conclusion: These results indicate that pts who attempt TD have a significantly higher risk of MR than pts who do not. DP in pts eligible for TD is a rare event (approximately 1 in 1000 pts, or 0.019% per year in a single pt) and its relationship with TD is not demonstrated. It is important to underline that the pt experiencing DP had a very poor compliance to retreatment after the end of TFR, which contributed to the transformation of his CML. Therefore, when selecting pts for a TD attempt, emphasis should we given also to their willingness to resume TKI treatment in case of TD failure.Keywords: Blast crisis, Chronic myeloid leukemia, Progression, treatment-free remission

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,108
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,879

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,337
Écart entre enseignants0,309 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHemaSphereMême sujetChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207