Risk Estimation of In-Pit Crushing System at the Operational Copper Mine in Kazakhstan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Due to the existing complicated features and huge scale of operations in open-pit mining, use of the in-pit crushing and conveying (IPCC) system is more promising compared to the truck and shovel system [6].Mine depth or scale expansion leads to an increase in the conveyance distance, hence, the performance of trucks rapidly reduces as haulage distance increases [6].The studied copper mine has ambitions to switch from a conventional truck and shovel system to the IPCC system and at the first stage implemented the in-pit crushing (IPC) system.However, several risks associated with truck dumping delays and therefore the IPC productivity loss have been identified.The aim of this study is to produce risk estimation of the IPC system installed at the operational copper mine in Kazakhstan.As a part of the risk estimation process, stochastic dynamic modelling methodology to examine how the IPC system will behave in the presence of ambiguous causes of delays to predict the system productivity over time has been used.The model analyses all data for the real case from which a best case scenario has been proposed.For the model input parameters, the time-tracking study of the in-pit crusher productivity and trucks haulage and dumping cycle has been produced.The time between truck arrivals, the dump time per truck, the spot time per truck, the tons per truck, the bin limit for full dumping, and the crushing rate were taken as basic input parameters.For simulation, a Poisson distribution is used for the time between arrivals, a Triangle distribution -for the dump time per truck, the spot time per truck and the crushing rate, and a PERT distribution -for the tons per truck.Only the bin limit for full dumping is assumed as a fixed value for this stage of simulation.By incorporating the dependencies between the variables into the Monte Carlo simulation, the probability of the values was evaluated using stochastic variables.As a result for the real case, tons dumped per hour varied from 1740 to 1975, number of truck arrivals per hour ranged from 30 to 32, number truck dumped per hour ranged from 14 to 16, delay time per truck at the crusher varied between 52 and 69 minutes.The best case scenario uses the quickest the dump time per truck and the spot time per truck.Thus the best case has 3475 to 3600 tons dumped per hour, 30 to 32 trucks arriving per hour, and 28 to 29 trucks dumped per hour with the delay time per truck at the crusher 2.4 and 5.5 minutes.The best case has twice higher tone dumper per hour and 10 times shorter delays.The developed model considered queuing issues at the in-pit crusher and can be used to analyse the impact of changing the bin size by changing the limits for full dumping and the crushing rate.The model is able to forecast the IPC system's future states and calculate the probability of various outcomes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».